FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  
who held that there are no different species of friendship, by reason of its admitting of degree, were led by insufficient proof." In this way to exceed reason or to fall short thereof belongs to sins specifically different, in so far as they result from different motives. Reply Obj. 2: It is not the sinner's intention to depart from reason; and so sins of excess and deficiency do not become of one kind through departing from the one rectitude of reason. On the other hand, sometimes he who utters a falsehood, intends to hide the truth, wherefore in this respect, it matters not whether he tells more or less. If, however, departure from the truth be not outside the intention, it is evident that then one is moved by different causes to tell more or less; and in this respect there are different kinds of falsehood, as is evident of the _boaster,_ who exceeds in telling untruths for the sake of fame, and the _cheat,_ who tells less than the truth, in order to escape from paying his debts. This also explains how some false opinions are contrary to one another. Reply Obj. 3: One may be prodigal and illiberal with regard to different objects: for instance one may be illiberal [*Cf. II-II, Q. 119, A. 1, ad 1] in taking what one ought not: and nothing hinders contraries from being in the same subject, in different respects. ________________________ NINTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 72, Art. 9] Whether Sins Differ Specifically in Respect of Different Circumstances? Objection 1: It would seem that vices and sins differ in respect of different circumstances. For, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv), "evil results from each single defect." Now individual defects are corruptions of individual circumstances. Therefore from the corruption of each circumstance there results a corresponding species of sin. Obj. 2: Further, sins are human acts. But human acts sometimes take their species from circumstances, as stated above (Q. 18, A. 10). Therefore sins differ specifically according as different circumstances are corrupted. Obj. 3: Further, diverse species are assigned to gluttony, according to the words contained in the following verse: "Hastily, sumptuously, too much, greedily, daintily." Now these pertain to various circumstances, for "hastily" means sooner than is right; "too much," more than is right, and so on with the others. Therefore the species of sin is diversified according to the various circumstances. _On the contra
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

circumstances

 

species

 
reason
 

respect

 

Therefore

 
Further
 

falsehood

 

illiberal

 
differ
 

results


individual

 

evident

 

specifically

 

intention

 
Whether
 

pertain

 

Circumstances

 

Respect

 

hastily

 

Specifically


Differ

 

Objection

 

Different

 

contra

 

diversified

 

subject

 

hinders

 

contraries

 

sooner

 
ARTICLE

respects

 

daintily

 

gluttony

 
assigned
 
diverse
 
circumstance
 

corruption

 

corrupted

 
contained
 

stated


Dionysius

 
greedily
 
single
 
corruptions
 

defects

 

Hastily

 
defect
 

sumptuously

 

deficiency

 

excess