FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>  
ality, and unreserve." He then urges: "A husband and wife ought to continue so long united as they love each other. Any law which should bind them to cohabitation for one moment after the decay of their affection, would be a most intolerable tyranny, and the most unworthy of toleration; and there is nothing _immoral_ in this separation, for love is free. To promise forever to love the same woman, is not less absurd than to promise to believe the same creed." He states categorically that "The present system of constraint does no more, in the majority of instances, than make hypocrites or open enemies. Persons of delicacy and virtue, unhappily united to those whom they find it impossible to love, spend the loveliest season of their lives in unproductive efforts to appear otherwise than they are, for the sake of the feelings of their partners or the welfare of their mutual offspring; and that the early education of their children takes its color from the squabbles of the parents. They are nursed in a systematic school of ill-humor, violence, and falsehood, and the conviction that wedlock is indissoluble holds out the strongest of all temptations to the perverse. They indulge without restraint in acrimony and all the little tyrannies of domestic life, when they know that their victim is without appeal. If this connection were put on a rational basis, each would be assured that habitual ill-temper would terminate in separation, and would check this vicious and dangerous propensity." He conceived from the re-arrangement of the marriage relation by greater facility of divorce than was to be had sixty years ago,[F] "A fit and natural arrangement would result." [Footnote F: It should be remembered that in Shelley's day divorce was obtainable by the most wealthy only, at an enormous cost and by a lengthy process, precluding the slightest opportunity for the middle and poorer classes to avail themselves thereof.] Shelley by no means asserts that the intercourse would be promiscuous, but on the contrary believed that from the relation of parent to child a union is generally of longer duration, placed on such a footing, and marked above all others with generosity and self-devotion. We are on the eve of great religious changes, which must consequently disturb all the social
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>  



Top keywords:

relation

 
Shelley
 
divorce
 

separation

 
united
 
promise
 
arrangement
 

remembered

 

marriage

 

natural


Footnote
 
facility
 

result

 
greater
 
connection
 

rational

 
appeal
 

domestic

 

victim

 

assured


tyrannies

 

dangerous

 

propensity

 

acrimony

 

conceived

 

vicious

 

habitual

 
temper
 
terminate
 

slightest


footing

 

marked

 
duration
 

parent

 

generally

 

longer

 

generosity

 

disturb

 

social

 
religious

devotion

 

believed

 

contrary

 

enormous

 
lengthy
 

process

 

precluding

 

obtainable

 

wealthy

 

restraint