FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  
s as well as his accusers. It was clearly shown at the time that although he dwelt in the house where the 'club' in question held forth, there never was any absolute proof that he was himself in any way actually connected with it, his vocation being that of a maker of dressing for boots, shoes, ladies' bags, and leather goods generally, which dressing he manufactured upon the premises." This statement, being correct, gave the _Morning Star_ a chance to clinch its argument yet more forcibly and to prove itself better informed than its rival by coming out in its next issue with the declaration that "there can no longer be any question relative to the identity of the murdered man. That he is, or rather was, the long-vanished Ferdinand Lovetski who was formerly identified with the club _and_ the boot-dressing industry carried on at 63 Essex Row, is established beyond all cavil, since the marks smeared upon his shirt bosom are now known to have been made with shoe-blacking of that variety which is applied and polished with a cloth, and which has of recent years almost entirely superseded the brush-applied variety of our fathers' and grandfathers' days!" Narkom, much impressed thereby, showed these two articles from the _Morning Star_ to Cleek. "An ingenious young man that reporter, Mr. Narkom, and his deductions regarding those marks reflect great credit upon him," said the latter. "For it is positively certain that whoever he may or may not have been, the man certainly was _not_ the Count de Louvisan, for the simple reason that there is _no_ 'Count de Louvisan' in the Austrian nobility, the title having lapsed some years ago. The theory that the dead man is that Ferdinand Lovetski who formerly lived at 63 Essex Row, however, will bear looking into. It is well thought out. I should, perhaps, be more impressed with the genius of the chap who worked out so likely a solution to those mysterious figures if he hadn't made me lose faith in his powers of observation by the 'shoe blacking' statement. It is not a bad _guess_, in the circumstances--for each would leave marks very similar, if one trusted to the eye alone--but I happen to _know_ that the figures were _not_ smeared on with shoe-blacking, but with a stick of that greasy, highly scented black cosmetic which some actresses use for their eyelashes and some men employ to disguise the gray hairs in the moustache. You know the kind of stuff I mean. It is always wrapped i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
blacking
 

dressing

 
Louvisan
 

Ferdinand

 
figures
 
Lovetski
 
smeared
 

Narkom

 

impressed

 

applied


variety

 

question

 

statement

 

Morning

 

thought

 

solution

 

mysterious

 

accusers

 

worked

 

theory


genius

 

lapsed

 

positively

 

nobility

 
Austrian
 
simple
 

reason

 

eyelashes

 

employ

 

actresses


highly

 
scented
 
cosmetic
 

disguise

 

wrapped

 

moustache

 

greasy

 

circumstances

 

observation

 
powers

credit
 
happen
 

trusted

 

similar

 
vanished
 

leather

 

ladies

 

manufactured

 

generally

 
identified