FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   >>  
ompanying His resolve to go to meet His fate at Jerusalem, the rejoicing in spirit at the success of the apostles' mission, His Agony and His universal love. The monophysites could not recognise this duality in Christ's emotional nature. Hunger and thirst, and even the higher human feelings they considered derogatory to the Son of God. Even when they admitted that He suffered, they threw a veil of mystery over His sufferings. They idealised the Passion. They made it seem as if His flesh was privileged, as if His omnipotence excused Him from the emotional experiences of humanity. SUMMARY OF THE CHAPTER We have examined the doctrine of one nature, and exposed its chief consequences. We have considered its effects in respect of the deity of Christ and in respect of His manhood. We have applied the doctrine to the human nature as a whole, and to the several parts that compose it. The result of the examination may be summarised in brief. Monophysitism destroys what is divine in the deity and what is human in the humanity. It offers to Christians a Christ who is not sufficiently above man to be able to help them by His power, nor sufficiently man to be able to help them by His sympathy. The monophysite Christ is neither very God nor very man, but a composition in which all traces of the original entities are lost to view. [1] "The Chronicle of Zachariah of Mitylene," translated by Hamilton and Brooks, chap. iii. p. 46. [2] This addition to the Trisagion was officially condemned at the close of the 7th century owing to its monophysite associations. [3] "Chronicle of Zachariah of Mitylene," translated by Hamilton and Brooks, ii. 2, p. 21. [4] The question of Justinian's orthodoxy has been debated by Bury and Hutton. See _Guardian_, March 4th and April 15th, 1896. CHAPTER IV THE ETHOS OF MONOPHYSITISM Monophysitism originated in a monastery. Eutyches, "the father of the monophysites," was a monk. The monastic temperament is peculiarly susceptible to this heresy, and the monastic element has always been dominant in the monophysite churches. The cloister is the natural habitat of the doctrine of the one nature. Monasticism is applied monism. If the world's existence be a sham, if its value compared with God be negligible, it becomes a religious duty to avoid all influences that heighten the illusion of the world's real existence and intrinsic value. The monist, like the monk, mu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   >>  



Top keywords:
Christ
 

nature

 

doctrine

 

monophysite

 

humanity

 

Chronicle

 
Brooks
 

Monophysitism

 

monastic

 

CHAPTER


Zachariah

 

applied

 

respect

 

Hamilton

 
translated
 

Mitylene

 

monophysites

 

considered

 

existence

 

emotional


sufficiently
 

debated

 

Justinian

 
orthodoxy
 
Trisagion
 

addition

 

condemned

 

associations

 

officially

 

century


question

 

MONOPHYSITISM

 

compared

 

negligible

 

natural

 

habitat

 

Monasticism

 
monism
 

religious

 

intrinsic


monist

 

illusion

 
influences
 
heighten
 

cloister

 

churches

 
Hutton
 

Guardian

 
originated
 

monastery