FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
e hanimals in this country_?" Loud cries of Oh! oh! oh! No doubt an eagle is an animal; like Mr Cobbett or Mr O'Connell--"a very fine animal;" but we particularly, and earnestly, and anxiously, request Sir Humphry Davy not to call her so again--but to use the term bird, or any other term he chooses, except animal. Animal, a living creature, is too general, too vague by far; and somehow or other it offends our ear shockingly when applied to an eagle. We may be wrong, but in a trifling matter of this kind Sir Humphry surely will not refuse our supplication. Let him call a horse an animal, if he chooses--or an ass--or a cow--but not an eagle--as he loves us, not an eagle; let him call it a bird--the Bird of Jove--the Queen or King of the Sky--or anything else he chooses--but not an animal--no--no--no--not an animal, as he hopes to prosper, to be praised in Maga, embalmed and immortalised. Neither ought Poietes to have asked if there were "_many_ of these animals" in this country. He ought to have known that there are not _many_ of these animals in any country. Eagles are proud--apt to hold their heads very high--and to make themselves scarce. A great many eagles all flying about together would look most absurd. They are aware of that, and fly in "ones and twos"--a couple perhaps to a county. Poietes might as well have asked Mungo Park if there were a great many lions in Africa. Mungo, we think, saw but one; and that was one too much. There were probably a few more between Sego and Timbuctoo--but there are not a "great many of those animals in that country"--though quite sufficient for the purpose. How the Romans contrived to get at hundreds for a single show, perplexes our power of conjecture. Halieus says--with a smile on his lip surely--in answer to the query of Poietes--"Of this species I have seen but these two; and, I believe, the young ones migrate as soon as they can provide for themselves; for this solitary bird requires a large space to move and feed in, and does not allow its offspring to partake its reign, or to live near it." This is all pretty true, and known to every child rising or risen six, except poor Poietes. He had imagined that there were "many of these animals in this country," that they all went a-fishing together as amicably as five hundred sail of Manksmen among a shoal of herrings. Throughout these Dialogues we have observed that Ornither rarely opens his mouth. Why so taciturn? On the subjec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

animal

 

country

 

animals

 

Poietes

 

chooses

 

surely

 

Humphry

 

Timbuctoo

 

contrived

 

answer


Romans
 

Halieus

 

conjecture

 
perplexes
 
sufficient
 
single
 

purpose

 
hundreds
 

amicably

 

hundred


Manksmen

 

fishing

 

imagined

 

taciturn

 

subjec

 

rarely

 

Throughout

 

herrings

 

Dialogues

 

observed


Ornither
 
rising
 
provide
 

solitary

 

requires

 

migrate

 

species

 

pretty

 
offspring
 
partake

shockingly

 

applied

 
offends
 

supplication

 
refuse
 

trifling

 
matter
 

general

 

creature

 
Cobbett