FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>  
ndals. All these names mean "feathered snake," "bird snake." Now, in the above mentioned section of the Dresden manuscript, pp. 29-43, there is found on page 36, middle, the representation of a bird and a snake, the two symbols of the god Kukulcan, which, at the same time, denote his name in the manner of a rebus. That this representation is to be referred to the god with the snake's tongue is rendered probable on the one hand by the fact that this whole section treats of him and is proved on the other hand by the circumstance that in the same place the same snake is found represented with the head of the god; thus, page 35, middle, and 36, above. In the same way this snake with the god's head is also found in the Codex Cortesianus, page 10, middle, a passage which is rendered notable also by the fact that in the writing above the picture there is expressly found as a second sign the name hieroglyph of the god. [Illustration: No. 36. _a_ _b_] _Cimi_ (?). Supposed symbols of the god of death. Occurring very frequently in all the codices, but with several variations (see Figs. 383 and 384). These are given chiefly on the authority of Drs. Foerstemann and Schellhas, as I have some doubt in reference to this conclusion, for reasons which will here be given. [Illustration: FIG. 383. The supposed god of death, from the Dresden Codex.] [Illustration: FIG. 384. The supposed god of death, from the Troano Codex.] As Dr. Schellhas remarks, this is "the most characteristic and most easily recognized deity of the Maya Codices"; but this statement will not apply to the symbols, as the variations are such as to render it exceedingly doubtful whether precisely the same idea is embodied in each. Even the two forms here given, both of which are found in all the codices and often together, present variations too marked for us to believe, except upon strong evidence, that they represent the same thing. Nor do the figures of this deity or supposed deity appear to embody throughout the same idea. In fact, they leave us in doubt as to whether any one recognized deity is to be understood. Was there in the Maya pantheon such a deity as the god of death? I have so far been unable to find any satisfactory reason for answering this question in the affirmative. In the first part of the Dresden Codex, which is devoted, in part at least, if not chiefly,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>  



Top keywords:

symbols

 
middle
 

supposed

 

Dresden

 

variations

 

Illustration

 

chiefly

 

recognized

 

Schellhas

 

codices


section

 

representation

 

rendered

 

embodied

 

marked

 

present

 

precisely

 

statement

 

mentioned

 

Codices


render

 

devoted

 

feathered

 

doubtful

 

exceedingly

 

understood

 

embody

 

pantheon

 

unable

 

reason


evidence

 

question

 
strong
 
affirmative
 

represent

 

figures

 

answering

 

satisfactory

 

remarks

 

hieroglyph


treats

 

frequently

 

Occurring

 

Supposed

 

expressly

 

picture

 

represented

 

circumstance

 

proved

 
notable