FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
II. 104 the charge of a 'magician' is furiously repudiated; yet do an incantation against a rival wife, a mocking hymn of exultation after subduing rivals, and a few other hymns of like sort show that magical practices were well known.[55] The sacrifice occupies a high place in the religion of the Rig Veda, but it is not all-important, as it is later. Nevertheless, the same presumptuous assumption that the gods depend on earthly sacrifice is often made; the result of which, even before the collection was complete (IV. 50), was to teach that gods and men depended on the will of the wise men who knew how properly to conduct a sacrifice, the key-note of religious pride in the Brahmanic period. Indra depends on the sacrificial _soma_ to accomplish his great works. The gods first got power through the sacrificial fire and _soma_.[56] That images of the gods were supposed to be powerful may be inferred from the late verses, "who buys this Indra," etc. (above), but allusions to idolatry are elsewhere extremely doubtful.[57] * * * * * FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 1: Compare T[=a]itt. S. VII. 4.2.1. The gods win immortality by means of 'sacrifice' in this later priest-ridden period.] [Footnote 2: Ludwig (IV. p. 134) wrongly understands a hell here.] [Footnote 3: 'Yama's seat' is here what it is in the epic, not a chapel (Pischel), but a home.] [Footnote 4: This may mean 'to Yama (and) to death.' In the Atharva Veda, V. 24. 13-14, it is said that Death is the lord of men; Yama, of the Manes.] [Footnote 5: It is here said, also, that the 'Gandharva in the waters and the water-woman' are the ties of consanguinity between Yama and Yam[=i], which means, apparently, that their parents were Moon and Water; a late idea, as in viii. 48. 13 (unique).] [Footnote 6: The passage, X. 17, 1-2, is perhaps meant as a riddle, as Bloomfield suggests (JAOS. XV. p. 172). At any rate, it is still a dubious passage. Compare Hillebrandt, _Vedische Mythologie_, I. p. 503.] [Footnote 7: Cited by Scherman, _Visionslitteratur_, p. 147.] [Footnote 8: Possibly, 'streams.'] [Footnote 9: AV. XVIII. 3. 13.] [Footnote 10: Compare AV. VI. 88. 2: "King Varuna and God Brihaspati," where both are gods.] [Footnote 11: [Greek: Kerberos](=Cabala)=_C[=a]rvara_. Saram[=a]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

sacrifice

 

Compare

 

passage

 

period

 

sacrificial

 
Atharva
 
Gandharva
 

Pischel

 
chapel

Kerberos

 

wrongly

 
understands
 

Cabala

 

Ludwig

 

Varuna

 

Brihaspati

 

waters

 
riddle
 
ridden

Bloomfield

 

Mythologie

 
dubious
 
Hillebrandt
 

Vedische

 

suggests

 

unique

 
consanguinity
 

streams

 

Possibly


apparently

 

Visionslitteratur

 

Scherman

 

parents

 
idolatry
 

religion

 
occupies
 

magical

 
practices
 

important


Nevertheless

 

result

 

earthly

 
presumptuous
 

assumption

 

depend

 

incantation

 

repudiated

 

furiously

 
charge