FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   >>  
e made rapid progress notwithstanding the opposition of the medical profession, and the ignorance and credulity of the public. The clergy vituperated her for the impiety of seeking to control the designs of Providence. Preaching in 1722, the Rev. Edward Massey, for example, affirmed that Job's distemper was confluent small-pox, and that he had been inoculated by the Devil. Lady Montagu, however, gained many supporters among the higher classes. In 1721 Mead was requested by the Prince of Wales to superintend the inoculation of some condemned criminals, the Prince intending afterward to continue the practice in his own family; the experiment was entirely successful, and the individuals on whom it was made afterward received their liberty (Adams). According to Rohe, inoculation was introduced into this country in 1721 by Dr. Zabdiel Boylston of Boston, who had his attention directed to the practice by Cotton Mather, the eminent divine. During 1721 and 1722 286 persons were inoculated by Boylston and others in Massachusetts, and six died. These fatal results rendered the practice unpopular, and at one time the inoculation hospital in Boston was closed by order of the Legislature. Toward the end of the century an inoculating hospital was again opened in that city. Early in the eighteenth century inoculation was extensively practiced by Dr. Adam Thomson of Maryland, who was instrumental in spreading a knowledge of the practice throughout the Middle States. Despite inoculation, as we have already seen, during the eighteenth century the mortality from small-pox increased. The disadvantage of inoculation was that the person inoculated was affected with a mild form of small-pox, which however, was contagious, and led to a virulent form in uninoculated persons. As universal inoculation was manifestly impracticable, any half-way measure was decidedly disadvantageous, and it was not until vaccination from cow-pox was instituted that the first decided check on the ravages of small-pox was made. Vaccination was almost solely due to the persistent efforts of Dr. Edward Jenner, a pupil of the celebrated John Hunter, born May 17, 1749. In his comments on the life of Edward Jenner, Adams, in "The Healing Art," has graphically described his first efforts to institute vaccination, as follows: "To the ravages of small-pox, and the possibility of finding some preventive Jenner had long given his attention. It is likely enough tha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   >>  



Top keywords:
inoculation
 

practice

 
Jenner
 

Edward

 
inoculated
 

century

 

ravages

 
efforts
 

eighteenth

 

hospital


persons
 

afterward

 

Boylston

 

Boston

 

Prince

 
attention
 

vaccination

 
increased
 
disadvantage
 

mortality


person

 

preventive

 

institute

 

affected

 

finding

 

possibility

 

practiced

 

Thomson

 

extensively

 

Maryland


instrumental
 

States

 

Despite

 
Middle
 

spreading

 

knowledge

 

decided

 

instituted

 
comments
 
opened

persistent

 

celebrated

 
Hunter
 

Vaccination

 

solely

 

universal

 

graphically

 

manifestly

 

virulent

 

uninoculated