FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60  
61   62   63   64   65   >>  
in the thirtieth of the same reign. By his first wife he had issue, Gilbert Hoo, his heir, Jonathan, Susan, Elizabeth: all died _sine prole_. He married, secondly, Susanna, daughter of John Orlebar, citizen of London, but by her had no issue. He died 17th September, 1700. The baronetcy became extinct in the person of Sir William Keate, D.D., who died 6th March, 1757." [Greek: Halieus] _Hour-glasses_ (Vol. viii., p. 454.).--In the church of Wiggenhall, St. Mary the Virgin, the iron frame of an hour-glass, affixed to a wooden stand, immediately opposite the pulpit, still remains. W. B. D. An iron hour-glass stand still remains near the pulpit in the church of Ashby-Folville, in this county (Leicester). It is fixed to the wall containing the staircase to the rood-loft. In the old church of Anstey, recently pulled down and rebuilt, was an ancient hour-glass stand, consisting of a pillar of oak, about four feet high, the top of which is surmounted by a light framework of wood for the reception of the hour-glass. This specimen is preserved in the museum of this town. WILLIAM KELLY. _Marriage of Cousins_ (Vol. viii., p. 387.).--If there is any foundation for such a statement as is contained in the Query of J. P. relative to the marriage of cousins, it consists rather in the marriage of first cousins once removed than of second cousins. It will be seen that the latter relationship belongs to the same generation, but it is not so with the former, which partakes more of the nature of uncle and aunt with nephew and niece. W. SLOANE SLOANE-EVANS. Cornworthy Vicarage, Totnes. There is no legal foundation for the statement that marriage with a second cousin is valid, and with a first cousin invalid. The following quotation from Burn's _Ecc. Law_ by Phill., vol. ii. p. 449., will probably be considered to explain the matter: "By the civil law first cousins are allowed to marry, but by the canon law both first and second cousins (in order to make dispensations more frequent and necessary) are prohibited; therefore, when it is vulgarly said that first cousins may marry, but second cousins cannot, probably this arose by confounding these two laws, for first cousins may marry by the civil law, and second cousins cannot by the canon law." J. G. Exon. _Waugh, Bishop of Carlisle_ (Vol. viii., p. 271.), was the son of Thomas and Margaret Waugh, of Appleby, in Wes
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60  
61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:

cousins

 

church

 

marriage

 

foundation

 
statement
 

SLOANE

 

remains

 
cousin
 

pulpit

 
Carlisle

Bishop

 

generation

 
belongs
 

nephew

 

nature

 
partakes
 

Margaret

 
removed
 

consists

 

relative


Appleby

 

contained

 

Thomas

 
relationship
 

prohibited

 

frequent

 

considered

 

explain

 

matter

 

dispensations


Totnes

 

Vicarage

 

Cornworthy

 

allowed

 

vulgarly

 

quotation

 
invalid
 
confounding
 
William
 

person


baronetcy
 

extinct

 

Virgin

 

affixed

 

Wiggenhall

 

Halieus

 

glasses

 

September

 

Jonathan

 

Elizabeth