FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
ho knows the picture would, in essentials, subscribe to. God help the artists if ever the criticism of pictures falls into the hands of painters! It would be a case of vivisection all round. Your pamphlet is a very natural result of your late disagreeable legal experiences, though not a very wise one. If the critics are not better qualified to deal with the painters than the painter in your pamphlet shows himself qualified to deal with the critics, it will be a bad day for art when the hands that have been trained to the brush lay it aside for the pen.[19] [Note 19:!?] If you had read my article on Velasquez, I cannot but say that you have made an unfair use of it, in quoting a detached sentence, which, read with the context, bears exactly the opposite sense from that you have quoted it as bearing. This is a bad "throw-off" in the critical line; whether it affect "_le premier litterateur venu_" or yours always, TOM TAYLOR. P.S.--_As your attack on my article is public, I reserve to myself the right of giving equal publicity to this letter._ LAVENDER SWEEP, Jan, 6, 1879. _The Position_ Dead for a ducat, dead! my dear Tom: and the rattle has reached me by post. [Sidenote: _The World_, Jan. 15, 1879.] "_Sans rancune_," say you? Bah! you scream unkind threats and die badly. Why squabble over your little article? You _did_ print what I quote, you know, Tom; and it is surely unimportant what more you may have written of the Master. That you should have written anything at all is your crime. No; shrive your naughty soul, and give up Velasquez, and pass your last days properly in the Home Office. Set your house in order with the Government for arrears of time and paper, and leave vengeance to the Lord, who will forgive my "garbling" Tom Taylor's writing. THE WHITE HOUSE, Jan. 8, 1879. [Illustration] _Serious Sarcasm_ Pardon me, my dear Whistler, for having taken you _au serieux_ even for a moment. I ought to have remembered that your penning, like your painting, belongs to the region of "chaff." I will not forget it again; and meantime remain yours always, TOM TAYLOR. LAVENDER SWEEP, Jan. 9, 1879. _Final_ Why, my dear old Tom, I never _was_ serious w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

article

 
Velasquez
 
qualified
 

critics

 
TAYLOR
 
written
 
pamphlet
 

LAVENDER

 

painters

 

rancune


Sidenote
 
naughty
 

shrive

 
squabble
 
threats
 

unkind

 
Master
 

unimportant

 

surely

 

scream


penning

 

remembered

 

painting

 

belongs

 

moment

 

serieux

 

region

 
forget
 
meantime
 

remain


Whistler

 

Pardon

 
arrears
 

vengeance

 

Government

 

properly

 

Office

 

forgive

 

Illustration

 
Serious

Sarcasm

 

garbling

 

Taylor

 

writing

 
public
 

painter

 

experiences

 

trained

 

disagreeable

 

artists