FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>  
s or exemptions such a just and equal system may abolish or abridge. The first principles on the subject will naturally suggest themselves on the principle of "_lucus a non lucendo_," upon considering the gross inequalities, the enormous injustice of our present system of direct taxation. Upon reviewing it, one can hardly discover under what prevailing interest in the Legislature the regulations have been framed, so strangely is occasional and unjust favour to the landed interest, in some particulars, blended with frequent and equally unjust oppression of them in others--so unequally is undue favour to the middle classes, in some respects, combined with unjust and partial burdens upon them in others. To begin with one particular, in which the landed interest are greatly and unjustly exempted, while the other classes are severely and unjustly burdened. There is no duty on bequests or inheritance in land, while there is such a duty, and a very heavy one, in movable succession. The legacy duty on succession, from one unconnected with the legatee by blood, is ten _per cent._; from relations six, and from parents one _per cent._ By the aid of the probate duty, which must be paid by the executors, and the expense of suing out letters of administration in England, or an edict and confirmation as executor in Scotland, these duties are practically nearly doubled. Succession in land, on the other hand, costs nothing, at least nothing requires to be paid to government; and though the expense of making up titles to landed estates is often very heavy, that is a burden for the benefit of lawyers, not the good of the state. A poor man who gets a legacy of L100, pays L10 direct to the Exchequer, and the executor, in addition, pays the heavy stamp on probate of the succession; but the great landholder succeeds to L100,000 a-year without paying a shilling to the state. A creditor in Scotland, who succeeds to a bond for L100,000, heritably secured, pays nothing; if it is on personal security, he pays the full legacy duty of L10,000. This glaring inequality, the remnant of the days of feudal oppression, or the relic of a time when the landholders had no money, and taxes could be extracted from movable property only, should forthwith be abolished. Succession of all kinds, whether in land, bonds heritably secured, or movable funds, should be taxed at the same rate. And by the addition of the vast amount of the landed property to the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>  



Top keywords:

landed

 

interest

 

succession

 

legacy

 
movable
 

unjust

 

unjustly

 
addition
 

system

 
favour

oppression

 
succeeds
 

expense

 

probate

 
Succession
 

Scotland

 

executor

 

classes

 

property

 

heritably


secured

 

direct

 

extracted

 
estates
 

landholders

 

benefit

 
lawyers
 

titles

 

burden

 

making


doubled

 

abolished

 

forthwith

 

amount

 
government
 

requires

 
landholder
 

personal

 

creditor

 
paying

practically

 

security

 
Exchequer
 

feudal

 
shilling
 

remnant

 
glaring
 
inequality
 

reviewing

 
taxation