FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
the gage, as shown somewhat exaggerated at _D_; in that case the center would be shifted a little more towards the front, whereas if the taper were too steep, the adjustment would, of course, be in the opposite direction. A light cut would then be taken, to be followed by another test. If the plug should fit the gage so well that there was no perceptible shake, it could be tested more closely as follows: Draw three or four chalk lines along the tapering surface, place the work in the gage and turn it a few times. The chalk marks will then show whether the taper of the plug corresponds to that of the gage; for example, if the taper is too great, the marks will be rubbed out on the large end, but if the taper is correct, the lines throughout their length will be partially erased. [Illustration: Fig. 5. Setting Work for Taper Turning by use of Caliper Gage] Another and more accurate method of testing tapers is to apply a thin coat of Prussian-blue to one-half of the tapering surface, in a lengthwise direction. The work is then inserted in the hole or gage and turned to mark the bearing. If the taper is correct, the bearing marks will be evenly distributed, whereas if the taper is incorrect, they will appear at one end. Tapering pieces that have to be driven tightly into a hole, such as a piston-rod, can be tested by the location of the bearing marks produced by actual contact. After the taper is found to be correct, the plug is reduced in size until it just enters the gage as at _C_. The final cut should leave it slightly above the required size, so that a smooth surface can be obtained by filing. It should be mentioned that on work of this kind, especially if great accuracy is required, the final finish is often obtained by grinding in a regular grinding machine, instead of by filing. When this method is employed, a lathe is used merely to rough-turn the part close to size. [Illustration: Fig. 6. Side View showing Relative Positions of Gage and Work] When the amount that the tailstock center should be offset is determined by calculating, as in the foregoing example, it is usually necessary to make slight changes afterward, and the work should be tested before it is too near the finished size so that in case one or more trial cuts are necessary, there will be material enough to permit this. When there are a number of tapered pieces to be turned to the same taper, the adjustment of the tailstock center will have
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

correct

 
tested
 

bearing

 

center

 

surface

 

filing

 
method
 

required

 

turned

 

pieces


obtained

 

grinding

 

Illustration

 
tapering
 
tailstock
 

adjustment

 

direction

 

enters

 

smooth

 

slightly


finished
 

number

 
location
 

produced

 
tapered
 
piston
 

actual

 

contact

 

reduced

 
material

permit
 
mentioned
 
amount
 
offset
 

employed

 

Positions

 

Relative

 

showing

 

determined

 
calculating

accuracy

 

finish

 

afterward

 
slight
 

foregoing

 

machine

 

regular

 
Caliper
 

closely

 

perceptible