FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>  
e Miscellaneous Letters were the letters of Junius, and took them as authority, without one thought of inquiry into their authenticity. But his great work should have been, first to _prove_ the Miscellaneous Letters _genuine_. After this he should have shown that Francis was a Scotchman, who was chagrined at the abuse of the Scotch, and at the same time was an Englishman who was intensely exasperated at the Scotch, and that these two facts are not inconsistent with his being an Irishman. In conclusion, I will submit the following letter of Francis in reply to the editor of the Monthly Magazine, who had made inquiry of Sir Philip, in regard to his being the author of the Letters of Junius: JULY, 1813. SIR--The great civility of your letter induces me to answer it, which, with reference merely to its subject matter, I should have declined. Whether you will assist in giving currency to a silly, malignant falsehood, is a question for your own discretion. To me it is a matter of perfect indifference. I am sir, yours, etc., P. FRANCIS. I think the word _silly_ in the above letter has a telling significance. * * * * * Transcriber's Notes: 1. General transcription clarifying notes: A. The original printing of this book did not include a Table of Contents, one has been added by the transcriber to aid reader navigation. Major text breaks and page headers were used to formulate the "Chapters". B. Footnotes have been moved to Chapter ends and have been assigned letters instead of symbols. Each footnote originally appeared on the same page as its reference point. C. In the chapter entitled "Letter--To the Printer of the Public Advertiser" the footnotes section has been re-titled "DOCTORS NOTES" to coordinate with the next chapter entitled "Comments on Doctors Notes". The note references have been placed in brackets, [1], [2], etc., instead of the parentheses in the original text. E. In the original book passages of "Common Sense" and the "Letters of Junius" were presented side by side. In this e-text these comparisons have been made by differently indented paragraph blocks. Additional quotes and emdashes have been added as needed. 2. Spelling corrections: (#) = times correctly spelled elsewhere in text. Pg.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>  



Top keywords:
Letters
 

Junius

 

letter

 

original

 

inquiry

 

Miscellaneous

 

matter

 
entitled
 

chapter

 
Scotch

Francis

 

reference

 

letters

 

assigned

 

originally

 
symbols
 

footnote

 
appeared
 

headers

 

transcriber


reader

 
printing
 

Contents

 

include

 

navigation

 

Footnotes

 

Chapters

 
formulate
 

breaks

 

Chapter


Comments
 

indented

 
paragraph
 

blocks

 

Additional

 

differently

 

comparisons

 

Common

 

presented

 

quotes


emdashes

 

spelled

 

correctly

 
needed
 
Spelling
 

corrections

 
passages
 

footnotes

 

section

 

titled