FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  
be our ambition to make a positive diagnosis before failure to recover in a reasonable time leads to a conclusion of chronicity. It is probably safe to assume, on the basis of as large a series as ours, that the symptoms of stupor _per se_ imply no bad prognosis. Further, it has been noted that a relatively pure type of reaction is seen, the symptoms appearing with tolerable consistency. In analyzing the histories of dementia praecox patients, therefore, one looks for inconsistencies among, or additions to, the stupor symptoms. We may say at the outset that we have been able to find no case of malignant stupor that showed what we regard as a typical benign stupor reaction, and it is questionable whether partial stupor as we have described it, ever occurs with a bad prognosis. Usually the discrepant symptoms in the dementia praecox cases are sufficiently marked to enable one to make a positive diagnosis quite soon after the case comes under observation. The law of benign stupor is a limitation of energy, emotion and ideational content. In dementia praecox we have a re-direction of attention and interest to primitive fantastic thoughts and a consequent perversion of energy and emotion. In many malignant stupors one can detect evidence of this second type of reaction in symptoms that are anomalous for stupor. For instance, one meets with frequent silly and inexplicable giggling. Then, too, smiling, tears or outbursts of rage, the occasions for which are not manifest, are much more frequent than in typical stupor. Similarly, delusional ideas (not concerned with death at all) may appear or the patient may indulge in speech that is quite scattered, not merely fragmentary. Two cases may be cited briefly to illustrate these dementia praecox symptoms superadded to those of stupor. CASE 20.--_Winifred O'M._ Age: 19. Single. Admitted to the Psychiatric Institute May 6, 1911. _F. H._ The occurrence of other nervous or mental disease in the family was denied. _P. H._ The patient seems to have been rather shy and goody-goody in disposition. According to her mother this seclusiveness did not begin to be markedly noticeable until the winter before her psychosis, when there was some trouble about getting work. She had previously been to a business school. Then she held a position as stenographer temporarily. When this job was over she had a number of po
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
stupor
 

symptoms

 

dementia

 

praecox

 

reaction

 

energy

 

prognosis

 

emotion

 

patient

 

benign


typical
 

positive

 
frequent
 

diagnosis

 

malignant

 

Winifred

 

Admitted

 

Single

 

scattered

 

Similarly


delusional

 
concerned
 

occasions

 

manifest

 
briefly
 

illustrate

 

fragmentary

 
indulge
 

speech

 

Psychiatric


superadded

 

trouble

 

winter

 

psychosis

 

previously

 

business

 

number

 

temporarily

 

school

 
position

stenographer

 
noticeable
 
nervous
 

mental

 

disease

 

family

 

occurrence

 

denied

 

outbursts

 

seclusiveness