FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756  
757   758   759   >>  
t good may come:"--they dare not seek to promote this separation, at the fearful expense of upholding, or in anywise, countenancing a humanity-crushing and God-defying system of oppression. Another charge against the abolitionists is implied in the inquiry you make, _whether since they do not "furnish in their own families or persons examples of intermarriage, they intend to contaminate the industrious and laborious classes of society of the North by a revolting admixture of the black element."_ This inquiry shows how difficult it is for southern minds, accustomed as they have ever been to identify labor with slavery, to conceive the true character and position of such "classes" at the North; and also how ignorant they are of the composition of our Anti-Slavery societies. To correct your misapprehensions on these points, I will briefly say, in the first place, that the laborers of the North are freemen and not slaves;--that they marry whom they please, and are neither paired nor unpaired to suit the interests of the breeder, or seller, or buyer, of human stock:--and, in the second place, that the abolitionists, instead of being a body of persons distinct from "the industrious and laborious classes," do, more than nineteen twentieths of them, belong to those "classes." You have fallen into great error in supposing, that _abolitionists_ generally belong to the wealthy and aristocratic classes. This, to a great extent, is true of _anti-abolitionists_. Have you never heard the boast, that there have been anti-abolition mobs, which consisted of "gentlemen of property and standing?" You charge upon abolitionists "_the purpose to create a pinching competition between black labor and white labor;" and add, that "on the supposition of abolition the black class, migrating into the free states, would enter into competition with the white class, diminishing the wages of their labor_." In making this charge, as well as in making that which immediately precedes it, you have fallen into the error, that abolitionists do not belong to "the industrious and laborious classes." In point of fact, the abolitionists belong so generally to these classes, that if your charge be true, they must have the strange "purpose" of "pinching" themselves. Whether "the black class" would, or would not migrate, I am much more pleased to have you say what you do on this point, though it be at the expense of your consistency, than to have you say,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756  
757   758   759   >>  



Top keywords:

abolitionists

 

classes

 

charge

 

belong

 

industrious

 

laborious

 

making

 
pinching
 
generally
 
purpose

abolition

 

fallen

 

competition

 

expense

 

inquiry

 

persons

 

anywise

 

upholding

 
consistency
 

consisted


create

 

standing

 

gentlemen

 
property
 

countenancing

 

oppression

 

system

 

Another

 
nineteen
 

twentieths


defying

 

aristocratic

 

extent

 

wealthy

 
humanity
 
crushing
 

supposing

 

fearful

 

separation

 

immediately


precedes

 

migrate

 

Whether

 

strange

 
supposition
 

promote

 

migrating

 

diminishing

 
states
 

pleased