FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>  
paper, where it made no great stir. But, on its publication in volume form, with the vastly better title, the book at once 'boomed,' as the phrase goes, to an extent then, in 1882, almost unprecedented. The secret of its immense success may almost be expressed in a phrase by saying that it is a book like _Gulliver's Travels_, _The Pilgrim's Progress_, and _Robinson Crusoe_ itself for all ages--boys, men, and women." Which just shows how far lapse as to a fact may lead to critical misreadings also. Mr Hammerton sometimes lets good folks say in his pages, without correction, what is certainly not correct. Thus at one place we are told that Stevenson was only known as Louis in print, whereas that was the only name by which he was known in his own family. Then Mr Gosse, at p. 34, is allowed to write: "Professor Blackie was among them on the steamer from the Hebrides, a famous figure that calls for no description, and a voluble shaggy man, clad in homespun, with spectacles forward upon his nose, who it was whispered to us, was Mr Sam Bough, the Scottish Academician, _a water- colour painter of some repute_, who was to die in 1878." Mr Sam Bough _was_ "a water-colour painter of some repute," but a painter in oils of yet greater repute--a man of rare strength, resource, and facility--never, perhaps, wholly escaping from some traces of his early experiences in scene-painting, but a true genius in his art. Ah, well I remember him, though an older man, yet youthful in the band of young Scotch artists among whom as a youngster I was privileged to move in Edinburgh--Pettie, Chalmers, M'Whirter, Peter Graham, MacTaggart, MacDonald, John Burr, and Bough. Bough could be voluble on art; and many a talk I had with him as with the others named, especially with John Burr. Bough and he both could talk as well as paint, and talk right well. Bough had a slight cast in the eye; when he got a _wee_ excited on his subject he would come close to you with head shaking, and spectacles displaced, and forelock wagging, and the cast would seem to die away. Was this a fact, or was it an illusion on my part? I have often asked myself that question, and now I ask it of others. Can any of my good friends in Edinburgh say; can Mr Caw help me here, either to confirm or to correct me? I venture to insert here an anecdote, with which my friend of old days, Mr Wm. MacTaggart, R.S.A., in a letter kindly favou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>  



Top keywords:

repute

 

painter

 

Edinburgh

 

colour

 

MacTaggart

 

correct

 

voluble

 

spectacles

 

phrase

 

genius


experiences

 

Graham

 

traces

 

wholly

 

remember

 

painting

 

MacDonald

 

Whirter

 
privileged
 

Scotch


youngster

 
escaping
 

Chalmers

 

youthful

 

Pettie

 

artists

 

excited

 

friends

 

question

 
confirm

venture
 

letter

 

kindly

 

anecdote

 
insert
 
friend
 
subject
 

slight

 
illusion
 

wagging


shaking

 

displaced

 

forelock

 

homespun

 

Crusoe

 

Travels

 

Pilgrim

 

Progress

 

Robinson

 

misreadings