FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>  
d will not urge nor even ask it to do anything which it does not judge to be wise and prudent and helpful. I have done my best to promote this right understanding of the position of Holland in the United States, and I shall continue to do so. I have no knowledge of any instructions from Washington in regard to the manner of delivering the President's note in Spain. "What I cannot understand is the general misunderstanding of that note. It expressly declared that it was not an offer of mediation nor a proposal of peace. It was simply a suggestion that the belligerents on both sides should state the terms on which they would be willing to consider and discuss peace. The Entente Powers have already done this with some clearness, and will probably soon do so even more clearly. The Central Powers have politely, even affectionately, but very practically, declined the President's invitation to state their terms. There is the deadlock on peace talk at present. When both sides are equally frank the world can judge whether the peace which all just men desire is near or far away." The accuracy and propriety of this statement have never been questioned by the Department of State. On the contrary, it was practically affirmed by the President in his address to the Senate on January 22, 1917, when he said: "On the 18th of December last I addressed an identic note to the Governments of the nations now at war, requesting them to state, more definitely than they had yet been stated by either group of belligerents, the terms upon which they would deem it possible to make peace. I spoke on behalf of humanity and of the rights of all neutral nations like our own, many of whose most vital interests the war puts in constant jeopardy. "The Central Powers united in a reply which stated merely that they were ready to meet their antagonists in conference to discuss terms of peace. "The Entente Powers have replied much more definitely and have stated, in general terms indeed, but with sufficient definiteness to imply details, the arrangements, guarantees, and acts of reparation which they deem to be indispensable conditions of a satisfactory settlement." Here, then, we come within sight of the first of the conditions which are absolutely precedent, at least so far as America is concerned, to any discussion of peace. 1. Germany must answer President Wilson's note of December 18, 1916. She must state her terms of peace, maximum or minim
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>  



Top keywords:

Powers

 

President

 

stated

 

conditions

 

general

 

Central

 
nations
 

practically

 

discuss

 

December


Entente

 

belligerents

 
interests
 

requesting

 

addressed

 

identic

 

Governments

 
rights
 
neutral
 

humanity


behalf

 
constant
 

precedent

 
America
 
absolutely
 

concerned

 

discussion

 

maximum

 
Germany
 

answer


Wilson

 

antagonists

 

conference

 

replied

 

united

 

sufficient

 

reparation

 

indispensable

 

satisfactory

 
settlement

guarantees

 
definiteness
 

details

 

arrangements

 
jeopardy
 

understand

 

delivering

 

manner

 
Washington
 

regard