FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55  
56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   >>   >|  
t as apologist for the "brotherhood of the net," myself included. In the first place, I will state roundly my sincere belief that _insects cannot feel pain_. This is no special pleading, or "making the wish the father to the thought," {51} but a conviction founded on an ample mass of evidence, on my own observations and experiments, and strengthened by analogical reasoning. I wish I had space to lay this evidence in full before the reader; but this being here impracticable, I will not damage the argument by taking a few links out of a chain of facts which depend on their close connexion with each other for their strength and value. There is, however, one fact which may be taken by itself, and goes a long way in our favour, that I must mention here. Insects, when mutilated in a way that would cause excessive pain and speedy death to vertebrate animals, afterwards perform all the functions of life--eating, drinking, &c. with the same evident _gusto_ and power of enjoyment as before. Plenty of striking instances of this are on record, and, as an example, I have seen a wasp that had been snipped in two, afterwards regale himself with avidity upon some red syrup, which, as he imbibed, gathered into a large ruby bead just behind the wings (where the stomach should have been); but really the creature's pleasure seemed to be only augmented by the change in his anatomy, because he could drink ten times his ordinary fill of sweets, without, of course, getting any the fuller. I could almost fancy a scientific epicure envying the insect his ever fresh appetite and gastronomic capabilities. After all that can be said on this subject, there will still probably be misgivings in the mind of many, both {52} as to the question of insect feelings and also as to our right to shorten their existence, even by a painless death. As to the first point, we have now the means of giving any insect an utterly painless quietus, be it capable of feeling pain or no. In regard to the second, I think few will deny that man enjoys a vested right to make use of any of the inferior animals, even to the taking of their life, if the so doing ministers to his own well-being or pleasure, and practically every one assumes this right in one way or another. Game animals are shot down (and they assuredly _do_ feel pain), not as necessaries of life, but confessedly as luxuries. Fish are hooked, crabs, lobsters, shrimps perish by thousands, victims to our
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55  
56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

insect

 

animals

 

taking

 
painless
 

evidence

 
pleasure
 

capabilities

 

shrimps

 

lobsters

 
gastronomic

appetite

 

subject

 

creature

 

envying

 

sweets

 

victims

 

change

 
ordinary
 
fuller
 
anatomy

scientific

 

perish

 
thousands
 

augmented

 

epicure

 

vested

 

enjoys

 
assuredly
 

necessaries

 

inferior


assumes

 

practically

 

ministers

 

regard

 

feeling

 

hooked

 

shorten

 
existence
 

feelings

 
question

luxuries

 

stomach

 

utterly

 

quietus

 

capable

 

confessedly

 

giving

 

misgivings

 

record

 

impracticable