FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691  
692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   >>   >|  
en the least notice of Christ_. 8. Neither Justin, in his dialogue with Typho the Jew, nor Clemens Alexandrinus, who made so many extracts from ancient authors, nor Origen against Celsus, _have even mentioned this testimony_. 9. But, on the contrary, Origen openly affirms (ch. xxxv., bk. i., against Celsus), that Josephus, who had mentioned John the Baptist, _did not acknowledge Christ_.[565:1] In the "Bible for Learners," we read as follows: "Flavius Josephus, the well-known historian of the Jewish people, was born in A. D. 37, only two years after the death of Jesus; but though his work is of inestimable value as our chief authority for the circumstances of the times in which Jesus and his Apostles came forward, yet he does not seem to have ever mentioned Jesus himself. At any rate, the passage in his '_Jewish Antiquities_' that refers to him is certainly spurious, and was inserted by a later and a _Christian hand_. The _Talmud_ compresses the history of Jesus into a single sentence, and later Jewish writers concoct mere slanderous anecdotes. The ecclesiastical fathers mention a few sayings or events, the knowledge of which they drew from oral tradition or from writings that have since been lost. The Latin and Greek historians just mention his name. This meager harvest is all we reap from sources outside the Gospels."[565:2] Canon Farrar, who finds himself _compelled_ to admit that this passage in Josephus is an interpolation, consoles himself by saying: "The single passage in which he (Josephus) alludes to Him (Christ) is interpolated, if not wholly spurious, and no one can doubt that his silence on the subject of Christianity was as deliberate as it was dishonest."[565:3] The Rev. Dr. Giles, after commenting on this subject, concludes by saying: "_Eusebius_ is the first who quotes the passage, and our reliance on the judgment, _or even the honesty_, of this writer _is not so great as to allow of our considering everything found in his works as undoubtedly genuine_."[565:4] Eusebius, then, is the first person who refers to these passages.[565:5] Eusebius, "_whose honesty is not so great as to allow of our considering everything found in his works as undoubtedly genuine_." Eusebius, who says that _it is lawful to lie and cheat for the cause of Christ
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691  
692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Eusebius

 

Josephus

 
passage
 

Christ

 
Jewish
 

mentioned

 

mention

 

spurious

 

single

 

subject


refers

 
genuine
 

Celsus

 

undoubtedly

 
Origen
 
honesty
 
sources
 

Gospels

 

fathers

 
harvest

meager
 

historians

 

events

 

tradition

 
writings
 
sayings
 

knowledge

 

reliance

 

judgment

 

writer


quotes
 

concludes

 

commenting

 

person

 

lawful

 

passages

 

consoles

 

alludes

 

interpolated

 
interpolation

compelled

 
wholly
 
Christianity
 

deliberate

 

dishonest

 
silence
 

ecclesiastical

 
Farrar
 

Antiquities

 
Baptist