FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  
be offensive to the bees. But what kind of hive shall be made? In answer, some less than a thousand forms have been given. The advantages of bee-keeping depend as much upon the construction of hives, as any one thing; yet there is no subject pertaining to them on which there is such a variety of opinions, and I have but little hopes of reconciling all these conflicting views, opinions, prejudices, and interests. DIFFERENT OPINIONS ABOUT THEM. One is in favor of the old box, and the cruel practice of killing the bees to obtain the honey, as the only means to obtain "luck;" "they are sure to run out if they meddle with them." Another will rush to the opposite extreme, and advocate all the extravagant fancies of the itinerant patent-vender, as the _ne plus ultra_ of all hives, when perhaps it would be worth more for fire-wood than the apiary. THE AUTHOR HAS NO PATENT TO RECOMMEND. To remove from the mind of the reader all apprehension that I am about condemning one patent to recommend another, I would say in the beginning, that I have _no patent to praise, no interest in deceiving_, and I hope no prejudices to influence me, in advocating or condemning _any_ system. I wish to make bee-keeping plain, simple, economical, and profitable; so that when we sum up the profit "it shall not be found in the other pocket." It is a principle recognized by our statute, that no person is suitable as a Juror, who is biased either by interest or prejudice. Now whether I am the impartial Jurist, is not for me to say: but I wish to discuss the subject fairly. I hope some few will be enabled to see their own interest: at any rate, dismiss prejudice, as far as possible, while we examine wherein _one class_ in community is unprofitable to bee-keepers. SPECULATORS SUPPORTED LONG ENOUGH. We have faithfully supported a host of speculators on our business for a long time; often not caring one straw about our success, after pocketing the fee of successful "humbuggery." One is no sooner gone, than we are beset by another, with something altogether different, and of course the acme of perfection. PREFIX OF PATENT A BAD RECOMMENDATION. This has been done until the very prefix of patent, or premium, attached to a hive, renders it almost certain that there must be something deleterious to the apiarian; either in expense of construction or intricate and perplexing in management, requiring an engineer to manage, and a skil
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

patent

 

interest

 

prejudice

 
opinions
 

condemning

 

obtain

 

prejudices

 
keeping
 

construction

 

subject


PATENT

 

keepers

 

SPECULATORS

 

dismiss

 

unprofitable

 

community

 

examine

 

suitable

 
biased
 

person


statute

 
pocket
 

principle

 
recognized
 

SUPPORTED

 

enabled

 
fairly
 
impartial
 

Jurist

 

discuss


caring
 
prefix
 

premium

 

attached

 
renders
 

RECOMMENDATION

 

requiring

 
engineer
 

manage

 

management


perplexing

 

deleterious

 

apiarian

 
expense
 

intricate

 

PREFIX

 
business
 
speculators
 
ENOUGH
 

faithfully