FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   >>  
ers, or what Works of theirs has been communicated to him, that he should know more than all Mankind? One would think he was their Master by what he says, in the next Page, _What I have most at Heart, is some Method for ascertaining and fixing our Language for ever._ Now you must know, that this Reverend Author, who is so concern'd for the Fixing our Language, has himself a Style of a very deficient Character; in which the Reader will perceive how much we shou'd be _improv'd_, by having his manner _ascertained and fixed_; for doubtless he thinks his own the best, and his Friends know no better than to be of his Mind. _He would be more comprehensive_, says an Author of Note, _if he would alter and correct his Style, which is too loose and diffus'd in all Conscience. So that when I read him sometimes for a good while together, tho' I go on very evenly and smoothly, I find it difficult to recollect what I have been doing, and whether I have been reading or sleeping. My present Advice to him therefore is, that he would study +Tacitus+, and such other Politicians as say much in few Words: And if he obstinately persists in the same Childish fondness for his Style, I shall be obliged to shew in how small a Compass the whole Substance of what he says, may be contained. All this vile Drudgery will I submit to for his sake_, &c. But so little likelihood there is of his mending his Style by reading _Tacitus_, that he defies him and charges him with the Corruption of the _Roman_ Tongue, by saying that in Two or Three Words, about which such a Genius as he is might have employ'd Twenty or Thirty. This Brevity he calls Affectation, and assures us, it brought Barbarisms into the _Latin_ Tongue, even before the _Goths_ invaded _Italy_. However he exposes his own Ignorance, he should have been careful not to have discover'd his Friends: Does the _Translation_ of the _Bible_ teach us to understand _Fairfax_? Are that and the _Common-Prayer_ the Standard of Language? Yet he affirms, that without them one cou'd not understand any thing written a hundred Years ago. Whereas the _Jerusalem_ of _Fairfax_ is older than that, and whoever reads it will find the Language as new as any can be expected from the New Academy these Fifty Years. For our Tongue is not so variable in the best Authors as the Doctor represents it, and the difference between the present _English_ and the _English_ a Hundred Years ago, is not so great as between the Old and Mod
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   >>  



Top keywords:

Language

 

Tongue

 

Tacitus

 

present

 
Fairfax
 

reading

 

Author

 

understand

 

English

 

Friends


Thirty

 

Barbarisms

 

Twenty

 
Brevity
 
Affectation
 
brought
 

assures

 

likelihood

 

Drudgery

 

submit


mending

 

defies

 

Genius

 
charges
 

Corruption

 

employ

 
expected
 
Academy
 

Jerusalem

 
Hundred

difference
 

represents

 
variable
 

Authors

 
Doctor
 

Whereas

 

hundred

 
Translation
 

discover

 

careful


However

 
exposes
 

Ignorance

 

Common

 
written
 

contained

 

Prayer

 

Standard

 
affirms
 

invaded