FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   >>  
ers, or what Works of theirs has been communicated to him, that he should know more than all Mankind? One would think he was their Master by what he says, in the next Page, _What I have most at Heart, is some Method for ascertaining and fixing our Language for ever._ Now you must know, that this Reverend Author, who is so concern'd for the Fixing our Language, has himself a Style of a very deficient Character; in which the Reader will perceive how much we shou'd be _improv'd_, by having his manner _ascertained and fixed_; for doubtless he thinks his own the best, and his Friends know no better than to be of his Mind. _He would be more comprehensive_, says an Author of Note, _if he would alter and correct his Style, which is too loose and diffus'd in all Conscience. So that when I read him sometimes for a good while together, tho' I go on very evenly and smoothly, I find it difficult to recollect what I have been doing, and whether I have been reading or sleeping. My present Advice to him therefore is, that he would study +Tacitus+, and such other Politicians as say much in few Words: And if he obstinately persists in the same Childish fondness for his Style, I shall be obliged to shew in how small a Compass the whole Substance of what he says, may be contained. All this vile Drudgery will I submit to for his sake_, &c. But so little likelihood there is of his mending his Style by reading _Tacitus_, that he defies him and charges him with the Corruption of the _Roman_ Tongue, by saying that in Two or Three Words, about which such a Genius as he is might have employ'd Twenty or Thirty. This Brevity he calls Affectation, and assures us, it brought Barbarisms into the _Latin_ Tongue, even before the _Goths_ invaded _Italy_. However he exposes his own Ignorance, he should have been careful not to have discover'd his Friends: Does the _Translation_ of the _Bible_ teach us to understand _Fairfax_? Are that and the _Common-Prayer_ the Standard of Language? Yet he affirms, that without them one cou'd not understand any thing written a hundred Years ago. Whereas the _Jerusalem_ of _Fairfax_ is older than that, and whoever reads it will find the Language as new as any can be expected from the New Academy these Fifty Years. For our Tongue is not so variable in the best Authors as the Doctor represents it, and the difference between the present _English_ and the _English_ a Hundred Years ago, is not so great as between the Old and Mod
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   >>  



Top keywords:

Language

 

Tongue

 
Tacitus
 

present

 

Fairfax

 

reading

 

Author

 
understand
 

English

 

Friends


Thirty

 

Barbarisms

 

Twenty

 
Brevity
 
Affectation
 

brought

 

assures

 
likelihood
 

Drudgery

 

submit


mending
 

defies

 
Genius
 

charges

 

Corruption

 

employ

 

expected

 

Academy

 

Jerusalem

 
Hundred

difference

 

represents

 

variable

 
Authors
 

Doctor

 
Whereas
 
hundred
 

Translation

 

discover

 
careful

However

 
exposes
 
Ignorance
 

Common

 

written

 

contained

 

Prayer

 
Standard
 
affirms
 

invaded