Project Gutenberg's History of the Plague in London, by Daniel Defoe

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net

Title: History of the Plague in London

Author: Daniel Defoe

Release Date: December 4, 2005 [EBook #17221]

Language: English

Character set encoding: ASCII

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HISTORY OF THE PLAGUE IN LONDON ***

Produced by Bethanne M. Simms, Louise Pryor and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

ECLECTIC ENGLISH CLASSICS

HISTORY
OF
THE PLAGUE IN LONDON

BY
DANIEL DEFOE

NEW YORK .:. CINCINNATI .:. CHICAGO
AMERICAN BOOK COMPANY

Copyright, 1894, by
AMERICAN BOOK COMPANY.

DEFOE--THE PLAGUE IN LONDON.
M. 2

[Illustration: PRINCIPAL WARDS AND PARISHES IN THE CITY OF LONDON,
1665.]

[Illustration: LONDON AND THE SUBURBS, SEVENTEENTH CENTURY.]

INTRODUCTION.

The father of Daniel Defoe was a butcher in the parish of St. Giles's,
Cripplegate, London. In this parish, probably, Daniel Defoe was born in
1661, the year after the restoration of Charles II. The boy's parents
wished him to become a dissenting minister, and so intrusted his
education to a Mr. Morton who kept an academy for the training of
nonconformist divines. How long Defoe staid at this school is not known.
He seems to think himself that he staid there long enough to become a
good scholar; for he declares that the pupils were "made masters of the
English tongue, and more of them excelled in that particular than of any
school at that time." If this statement be true, we can only say that
the other schools must have been very bad indeed. Defoe never acquired a
really good style, and can in no true sense be called a "master of the
English tongue."

Nature had gifted Defoe with untiring energy, a keen taste for public
affairs, and a special aptitude for chicanery and intrigue. These were
not qualities likely to advance him in the ministry, and he wisely
refused to adopt that profession. With a young man's love for adventure
and a dissenter's hatred for Roman Catholicism, he took part in the Duke
of Monmouth's rebellion (1685) against James II. More fortunate than
three of his fellow students, who were executed for their share