against him, and perhaps even in communication
with the English, who were ever ready to seek in France allies for the
furtherance of their attempts to regain there the fortunes wrested from
them by Joan of Arc and Charles VII. In view of such a position Louis
formed a resolution, unpalatable, no doubt, to one so jealous of his own
power, but indicative of intelligence and boldness; he confronted the
difficulties of home government in order to prevent perils from without.
The remembrance had not yet faded of the energy displayed and the
services rendered in the first part of Charles VII.'s reign by the
states-general; a wish was manifested for their resuscitation; and they
were spoken of, even in the popular doggerel, as the most effectual
remedy for the evils of the period.
"But what says Paris?"--"She is deaf and dumb."
"Dares she not speak?"--"Nor she, nor parliament."
"The clergy?"--"O! the clergy are kept mum."
"Upon your oath?"--"Yes, on the sacrament."
"The nobles, then?"--"The nobles are still worse."
"And justice?"--"Hath nor balances nor weights."
"Who, then, may hope to mitigate this curse?"
"Who? prithee, who?"--"Why, France's three estates."
"Be pleased, O prince, to grant alleviation . . ."
"To whom?"--"To the good citizen who waits . . ."
"For what?"--"The right of governing the nation . . ."
"Through whom? pray, whom?"--"Why, France's three estates."
In the face of the evil Louis felt no fear of the remedy. He summoned
the states-general to a meeting at Tours on the 1st of April, 1468.
Twenty-eight lords in person, besides representatives of several others
who were unable to be there themselves, and a hundred and ninety-two
deputies elected by sixty-four towns, met in session. The chancellor,
Juvenal des Ursins, explained, in presence of the king, the object of the
meeting: "It is to take cognizance of the differences which have arisen
between the king and Sir Charles, his brother, in respect of the duchy of
Normandy and the appanage of the said Sir Charles; likewise the great
excesses and encroachments which the Duke of Brittany hath committed
against the king by seizing his places and subjects, and making open war
upon him; and thirdly, the communication which is said to be kept up by
the Duke of Brittany with the English, in order to bring them down upon
this country, and hand over to them the places he doth hold in Normandy.
Whereupon we are of opinion that the peop
|