FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
was a confidential exposition of the motives which induced me to recommend two judges to the King. [Footnote: It was suggested that with these colleagues Sir J. Grant would be like a wild elephant between two tame ones. Alluding to the method of taming captured elephants in India.] It was never intended to be published, nor did I expect it would be. The expressions, therefore, were unadvised, but the sentiments were and are mine, deliberately formed upon full consideration of the official documents before me. Cabinet. It appears on looking into papers of 1825 and 1826 that so far from our having prohibited Mexico and Columbia from making any attack upon Cuba, we uniformly abstained from doing anything of the kind. The Americans declared they could not see with indifference any state other than Spain in possession of Cuba, and further their disposition to interpose their power should war be conducted in Cuba in a _devastating_ manner, and with a view to the excitement of a servile war. We offered to guarantee Cuba to Spain in 1823 if she would negotiate with the colonies with a view to their recognition. Subsequently we were willing to enter into a tripartite guarantee of Cuba to Spain with the United States and France. The United States seemed not unwilling, but France held back. Peel is to say there was no record of any prohibition, but that the United States declared so, and it was possible Mr. Canning may have intimated a similar disposition on our part. This is to keep open to us the faculty of interfering if we please. The Duke thinks my letter does not signify one pin. The simile of the elephants evidently means no more than that an indiscreet judge was placed between two discreet ones. The Duke told me he had offered a Lordship of the Treasury to Ashley, who had declined it. He then told him to make himself master of the Batta question. Ashley said he had not seen the papers. He said, let him see the papers. I told him I had sent them the moment I got them to him, and he had desired me to send them to the Cabinet room, which I did. When they were taken from the Cabinet room they went to the India Board, and Ashley might have seen them. I had never kept any papers from him. We then talked about the speech to be made in moving the committee. The Duke seems inclined to have little said. Peel seems disposed to say little; but he knows little. I think they are wrong. I am sure it is necessary to correct
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

papers

 

Ashley

 

United

 

States

 

Cabinet

 

France

 

declared

 

disposition

 

offered

 

guarantee


elephants

 

correct

 

interfering

 
disposed
 

inclined

 

committee

 
faculty
 
moving
 

letter

 

record


thinks

 

prohibition

 
Canning
 

intimated

 

similar

 

speech

 

desired

 

Treasury

 

Lordship

 

declined


master

 

moment

 

discreet

 

simile

 

evidently

 

question

 

talked

 

signify

 

indiscreet

 

conducted


expressions

 

unadvised

 

sentiments

 
expect
 

captured

 

intended

 

published

 

deliberately

 
appears
 
documents