FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  
the hand-writing before the entry was read. _Mr. Germain Lavie called again;_ _Examined by Mr. Gurney._ _Q._ Do you believe that to be the hand-writing of Mr. De Berenger? _A._ Yes I do, most certainly. _Cross-examined by Mr. Park._ _Q._ I observe this is pencil writing you have been speaking to; did you ever see any writing of this person in pencil before? _A._ No, never. _Q._ There is no difference in a man's writing with a pencil and with a pen? _A._ I conceive that to be written by Mr. De Berenger. _Q._ It is exactly like the character of that letter which has been given in evidence upon your testimony? _A._ Yes, it is the same sort of writing. _Mr. Serjeant Best._ I submit to your Lordship, still I am not removed from my objection. There is first a check of L.98. 2_s._ 6_d._; then an attempt is made to trace L.50. of that into the hands of Mr. De Berenger; the way in which that is attempted is, that a person says he gave change for that note of L.50.;--beyond that, they have produced a pencil memorandum, proved to be in the writing of Mr. De Berenger, at least there is some evidence of that; that pencil memorandum is merely this, not that a particular bank note; not that the note which came into the hand of the witness, and for which he gave change, but that a bank note of L.50. was paid to W. S. It does not appear that it was that bank note, and this, I submit, is no evidence in a criminal case. _Mr. Gurney._ I submit to your Lordship it is evidence, _valeat quantum_, it does not prove that Smith received that bank note from De Berenger, but that it came from De Berenger's servant; I shall give no other evidence to bring it home to De Berenger, and I submit that it is admissible evidence, as that which is proved to come so near as the child, the wife, or the servant. _Lord Ellenborough._ I think it is not evidence; it does not get the length of William Smith; but even if it were to be taken to refer to William Smith, it does not connect it with this bank note, or any other means of payment. I cannot translate "W. S." into "William Smith my servant," and "L.50." into "this L.50. bank note." You do not call William Smith. _Mr. Gurney._ No, certainly not, my Lord,--I shall leave that to my learned friends. _Mr. Benjamin Bray sworn;_ _Examined by Mr. Gurney._ _Q._ Where do you live? _A._ At Sunderland. _Q._ Will you look at this L.40. note
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

evidence

 

Berenger

 

writing

 

pencil

 

Gurney

 

William

 
submit
 

servant

 

Lordship


change

 
memorandum
 

Examined

 

proved

 

person

 

witness

 

criminal

 

admissible

 

valeat


quantum
 

received

 

learned

 
friends
 

Benjamin

 

translate

 

Sunderland

 
payment
 

Ellenborough


length
 

connect

 

difference

 

conceive

 

written

 

letter

 

character

 

speaking

 

called


Germain

 
observe
 

examined

 

testimony

 
attempt
 
attempted
 

produced

 
Serjeant
 
removed

objection