FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>  
08 as amended by the House bill. In doing so, the conferees have noted two letters dated September 22, 1976, sent respectively to John L. McClellan, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights, and to Robert W. Kastenmeier, Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice. The letters, from the Chairman of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU), Stanley H. Fuld, transmitted a document consisting of "guidelines interpreting the provision in subsection 108 (g) (2) of S. 22, as approved by the House Committee on the Judiciary." Chairman Fuld's letters explain that, following lengthy consultations with the parties concerned, the Commission adopted these guidelines as fair and workable and with the hope that the conferees on S. 22 may find that they merit inclusion in the conference report. The letters add that, although time did not permit securing signatures of the representatives of the principal library organizations or of the organizations representing publishers and authors on these guidelines, the Commission had received oral assurances from these representatives that the guidelines are acceptable to their organizations. The conference committee understands that the guidelines are not intended as, and cannot be considered, explicit rules or directions governing any and all cases, now or in the future. It is recognized that their purpose is to provide guidance in the most commonly-encountered interlibrary photocopying situations, that they are not intended to be limiting or determinative in themselves or with respect to other situations, and that they deal with an evolving situation that will undoubtedly require their continuous reevaluation and adjustment. With these qualifications, the conference committee agrees that the guidelines are a reasonable interpretation of the proviso of section 108 (g) (2) in the most common situations to which they apply today. c. Conference Report: Reprint of CONTU Guidelines on Photocopying and Interlibrary Arrangements The text of the guidelines follows: PHOTOCOPYING--INTERLIBRARY ARRANGEMENTS INTRODUCTION Subsection 108(g)(2) of the bill deals, among other things, with limits on interlibrary arrangements for photocopying. It prohibits systematic photocopying of copyrighted materials but permits interlibrary arrangements "that do no
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>  



Top keywords:

guidelines

 

Chairman

 

letters

 

Judiciary

 

Commission

 

organizations

 

conference

 

interlibrary

 

photocopying

 

situations


intended
 

representatives

 

committee

 
arrangements
 

Subcommittee

 

conferees

 

commonly

 

provide

 
purpose
 

encountered


guidance

 

limiting

 
determinative
 

limits

 

things

 
prohibits
 

systematic

 

directions

 

governing

 

explicit


considered
 

permits

 
Subsection
 
copyrighted
 

future

 

materials

 

recognized

 

respect

 

Photocopying

 

interpretation


proviso
 

reasonable

 

Interlibrary

 

qualifications

 
agrees
 

Guidelines

 

section

 

Reprint

 

Report

 
common