FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  
was a participant in the outrage on the City Dock on November 5th. "Honest" John Hogan claimed to have seen the defendant, Thomas Tracy, firing a revolver from one of the forward cabin windows. "Honest" John Hogan had the same difficulty as the other "identifying" witnesses when he also was asked to state whether it was possible to see a man firing from a cabin window when the stern of the boat was out and the witness in his specified position on the dock. "Honest" John Hogan was sure it was Tracy that he saw because the man had a week's growth of whiskers on his face. And this ended the case for the prosecution. As had been predicted there were hundreds of witnesses who were endorsed and not called, and almost without an exception those who testified were parties who had a very direct interest in seeing that a conviction was secured. But thru the clever work of the lawyers for the defense what was meant to have been a prosecution of the I. W. W. was turned into an extremely poor defense of the deputies and their program of "law and order." From the state's witnesses the defense had developed nearly the whole outline and many of the details of its side of the case. When the state rested its case, Tracy leaned over to the defense lawyers and, with a smile on his face, said: "I'd be willing to let the case go to the jury right now." CHAPTER VII. THE DEFENSE The case for the defense opened on Monday morning of April 2nd when Vanderveer, directly facing the judge and witness chair from the position vacated by the prosecution counsel, moved for a directed verdict of not guilty on the ground that there had been an absolute failure of evidence upon the question of conspiracy, any conspiracy of which murder was either directly or indirectly an incident, and there was no evidence whatever to charge the defendant directly as a principal in causing the death of Jefferson Beard. The motion was denied and an exception taken to the ruling of the court. Fred Moore made the opening statement for the defense. In his speech he briefly outlined the situation that had existed in Everett up to and including November 5th and explained to the jury the forces lined up against each other in Everett's industrial warfare. Not for an instant did the attention of the jury flag during the recital. Herbert Mahler, secretary of the I. W. W. in Seattle during the series of outrages in Everett, was the first witness placed up
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

defense

 

Honest

 

witnesses

 

Everett

 

witness

 

directly

 
prosecution
 

firing

 

exception

 

November


lawyers
 

position

 

defendant

 

evidence

 

conspiracy

 

question

 

murder

 

indirectly

 
incident
 

morning


Vanderveer

 
facing
 

Monday

 

opened

 

CHAPTER

 
DEFENSE
 

guilty

 
ground
 

absolute

 

failure


verdict

 

directed

 

vacated

 

counsel

 

opening

 

warfare

 

instant

 
industrial
 

explained

 

forces


attention
 
series
 

outrages

 
Seattle
 
secretary
 
recital
 

Herbert

 

Mahler

 

including

 

existed