FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   >>   >|  
of ecclesiastical cognizance, there the bishop must give notice to the patron of such his cause of refusal, who, being usually a layman, is not supposed to have knowlege of it; else he cannot present by lapse: but if the cause be temporal, there he is not bound to give notice[e]. [Footnote z: A layman may also be presented; but he must take priests orders before his admission. 1 Burn. 103.] [Footnote a: 2 Roll. Abr. 355.] [Footnote b: Glanv. _l._ 13. _c._ 20.] [Footnote c: 2 Roll. Abr. 356. 2 Inst. 632. Stat. 3 Ric. II. c. 3. 7 Ric. II. c. 12.] [Footnote d: 5 Rep. 58.] [Footnote e: 2 Inst. 632.] IF an action at law be brought by the patron against the bishop, for refusing his clerk, the bishop must assign the cause. If the cause be of a temporal nature and the fact admitted, (as, for instance, outlawry) the judges of the king's courts must determine it's validity, or, whether it be sufficient cause of refusal: but if the fact be denied, it must be determined by a jury. If the cause be of a spiritual nature, (as, heresy, particularly alleged) the fact if denied shall also be determined by a jury; and if the fact be admitted or found, the court upon consultation and advice of learned divines shall decide it's sufficiency[f]. If the cause be want of learning, the bishop need not specify in what points the clerk is deficient, but only allege that he _is_ deficient[g]: for the statute 9 Edw. II. st. 1. c. 13. is express, that the examination of the fitness of a person presented to a benefice belongs to the ecclesiastical judge. But because it would be nugatory in this case to demand the reason of refusal from the ordinary, if the patron were bound to abide by his determination, who has already pronounced his clerk unfit; therefore if the bishop returns the clerk to be _minus sufficiens in literatura_, the court shall write to the metropolitan, to reexamine him, and certify his qualifications; which certificate of the arch-bishop is final[h]. [Footnote f: 2 Inst. 632.] [Footnote g: 5 Rep. 58. 3 Lev. 313.] [Footnote h: 2 Inst. 632.] IF the bishop hath no objections, but admits the patron's presentation, the clerk so admitted is next to be instituted by him; which is a kind of investiture of the spiritual part of the benefice: for by institution the care of the souls of the parish is committed to the charge of the clerk. When a vicar is instituted, he (besides the usual forms) takes, if required by the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

bishop

 

patron

 

admitted

 

refusal

 
nature
 
benefice
 

instituted

 

deficient

 
determined

denied

 

spiritual

 
ecclesiastical
 

presented

 

temporal

 
layman
 

notice

 
determination
 

sufficiens

 
literatura

returns

 

pronounced

 

demand

 
belongs
 
person
 

fitness

 

express

 
examination
 
reason
 

ordinary


nugatory

 
certificate
 

parish

 

committed

 
institution
 

investiture

 

charge

 

required

 

cognizance

 
qualifications

reexamine

 
certify
 

presentation

 

admits

 

objections

 

metropolitan

 

refusing

 

assign

 

brought

 
action