FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   >>   >|  
_ etc., incorporated in the _Prayer-Booklet,_ was not adapted for children and parents, as it was not drawn up in questions and answers. To the experienced teacher it furnished material in abundance, but children and parents had need of a simpler book. Hardeland says: "It is certain that Luther in 1526 already conceived the ideal catechism to be a brief summary of the most important knowledge [in questions and answers], adapted for memorizing and still sufficiently extensive to make a thorough explanation possible, at once confessional in its tone, and fitted for use in divine service." (_Katechismusgedanken_ 2.) But if Luther in 1526 had conceived this idea, it was not carried out until three years later. However, what Luther said on teaching the Catechism by questions and answers, in the _German Order of Worship,_ was reprinted repeatedly (probably for the first time at Nuernberg) under the title: "Doctor Martin Luther's instruction how to bring the children to God's Word and service, which parents and guardians are in duty bound to do, 1527." This appeal of Luther also called forth quite a number of other explanations of the Catechism. Among the attempts which appeared before Luther's Catechisms were writings of Melanchthon, Bugenhagen, Eustasius Kannel, John Agricola, Val. Ickelsamer, Hans Gerhart, John Toltz, John Bader, Petrus Schultz, Caspar Graeter, Andr. Althamer, Wenz. Link, Conr. Sam, John Brenz, O. Braunfels, Chr. Hegendorfer, Caspar Loener, W. Capito, John Oecolampad, John Zwick, and others. The work of Althamer, the Humanist and so-called Reformer of Brandenburg-Ansbach, was the first to bear the title "Catechism." As yet it has not been ascertained whether, or not, Luther was acquainted with these writings. Cohrs says: "Probably Luther followed this literature with interest, and possibly consulted some of it; the relationship is nowhere close enough to exclude chance; still the frequent allusions must not be overlooked; as yet it cannot be simply denied that Luther was influenced by these writings." On the other hand, it has been shown what an enormous influence Luther exercised on that literature, especially by his _Brief Form_ and his _Prayer-Booklet._ "In fact," says Cohrs, "Luther's writings can be adduced as the source of almost every sentence in most of these books of instruction." (W. 30, 1, 474.) Evidently, Luther's appeal of 1526 had not fallen on deaf ears. 96. Luther's Catechetical Publicati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Luther

 

writings

 

Catechism

 

parents

 
children
 

answers

 

questions

 
service
 

Caspar

 
literature

called

 
Althamer
 

instruction

 

appeal

 
Prayer
 

Booklet

 

conceived

 

adapted

 

ascertained

 

Ansbach


consulted

 

Brandenburg

 

Probably

 
incorporated
 

possibly

 

Reformer

 
acquainted
 

interest

 

Humanist

 

furnished


Graeter

 

teacher

 

Braunfels

 

Oecolampad

 
Hegendorfer
 

Loener

 
experienced
 

Capito

 

source

 
sentence

adduced

 

Catechetical

 
Publicati
 

fallen

 
Evidently
 

frequent

 
allusions
 
overlooked
 

chance

 
exclude