FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   >>   >|  
i gegessen wird, also dass alles, was das Brot wirkt und leidet, der Leib Christi wirke und leide, dass er ausgeteilt [ge]gessen und mit den Zaehnen zerbissen werde." (St. L. 17, 2052.) Self-evidently, when writing thus, Luther had no Capernaitic eating and drinking in mind, his object merely being, as stated to emphasize the reality of the sacramental union. January [1]0, 1535, however, the day after his return from Cassel, Melanchthon wrote to his intimate friend Camerarius that at Cassel he had been the messenger not of his own, but of a foreign opinion. (_C. R._ 2, 822) As a matter of fact, Melanchthon returned to Wittenberg a convert to the compromise formula of Bucer, according to which Christ's body and blood are truly and substantially received in the Sacrament, but are not really connected with the bread and wine, the signs or _signa exhibitiva_, as Bucer called them. Stating the difference between Luther and Bucer, as he now saw it, Melanchthon said: "The only remaining question therefore is the one concerning the physical union of the bread and body,--and of what need is this question? _Tantum igitur reliqua est quaestio de physica coniunctione panis et corporis, qua quaestione quid opus est?_" (_C. R._ 2, 827. 842; St. L. 17, 2057.) To Erhard Schnepf he had written: "He [Bucer] confesses that, when these things, bread and wine, are given, Christ is truly and substantially present. As for me I would not demand anything further." (_C. R._ 2, 787.) In February he wrote to Brenz: "I plainly judge that they [Bucer, etc.] are not far from the view of our men; indeed in the matter itself they agree with us (_reipsa convenire_); nor do I condemn them." (2, 843; St. L. 17, 2065.) This, however, was not Luther's view. In a following letter Melanchthon said: "Although Luther does not openly condemn it [the formula of Bucer], yet he did not wish to give his opinion upon it as yet. _Lutherus, etsi non plane damnat, tamen nondum voluit pronuntiare_." (_C. R._ 2, 843; St. L. 17, 2062.) A letter of February 1, 1535, to Philip of Hesse and another of February 3, to Bucer, also both reveal, on the one hand, Melanchthon's desire for a union on Bucer's platform and, on the other, Luther's attitude of aloofness and distrust. (_C. R._ 2, 836. 841.) 202. Secret Letters and the Variata of 1540. In the letter to Camerarius of January 10, 1535, referred to in the preceding paragraph, Melanchthon plainly indicates that his views
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Melanchthon

 

Luther

 

letter

 
February
 

matter

 

Christ

 

formula

 

January

 

condemn

 
Camerarius

substantially

 
opinion
 
Cassel
 

plainly

 
question
 

confesses

 

written

 

Schnepf

 
Erhard
 
demand

present

 
things
 

Although

 

platform

 
attitude
 

aloofness

 

distrust

 
desire
 

reveal

 

preceding


referred

 

paragraph

 

Secret

 

Letters

 

Variata

 

Philip

 

openly

 

reipsa

 

convenire

 

nondum


voluit

 

pronuntiare

 
damnat
 

Lutherus

 

drinking

 

object

 

eating

 
Capernaitic
 

evidently

 

writing