FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687  
688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   >>  
ent or gaseous ball from which the planets were successively separated. Life, as we define it, was not possible for aeons subsequent to this separation. When and how did it appear? I have already pressed this question, but have received no answer. [Footnote: In the 'Apology for the Belfast Address,' the question is reasoned out.] If, with Professor Knight, we regard the Bible account of the introduction of life upon the earth as a poem, not as a statement of fact, where are we to seek for guidance as to the fact? There does not exist a barrier possessing the strength of a cobweb to oppose to the hypothesis, which ascribes the appearance of life to that 'potency of matter' which finds expression in natural evolution. [Footnote: 'We feel it an undeniable necessity,' says Professor Virchow, not to sever the organic world from the whole, as if it were something disjoined from the whole.' This grave statement cannot be weakened by the subsequent pleasantry regarding 'Carbon & Co.'] This hypothesis is not without its difficulties, but they vanish when compared with those which encumber its rivals. There are various facts in science obviously connected, and whose connections we are unable to trace; but we do not think of filling the gap between them by the intrusion of a separable spiritual agent. In like manner though we are unable to trace the course of things from the nebula, when there was no life in our sense, to the present earth where life abounds, the spirit and practice of science pronounce against the intrusion of an anthropomorphic creator. Theologians must liberate and refine their conceptions or be prepared for the rejection of them by thoughtful minds. It is they, not we, who lay claim to knowledge never given to man. Our refusal of the creative hypothesis is less an assertion of knowledge than a protest against the assumption of knowledge which must long, if not always, lie beyond us, and the claim to which is a source of perpetual confusion.' At the same time, when I look with strenuous gaze into the whole problem as far as my capacities allow, overwhelming wonder is the predominant feeling. This wonder has come to me from the ages just as much as my understanding, and it has an equal right to satisfaction. Hence I say, if, abandoning your illegitimate claim to knowledge, you place, with Job, your forehead in the dust and acknowledge the authorship of this universe to be past finding out--if, havin
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687  
688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   >>  



Top keywords:

knowledge

 

hypothesis

 
statement
 

Professor

 

question

 
unable
 

intrusion

 

science

 
subsequent
 

Footnote


nebula

 

abounds

 

present

 

creative

 
refusal
 

practice

 

creator

 

anthropomorphic

 

prepared

 

conceptions


liberate

 

Theologians

 

refine

 

pronounce

 

thoughtful

 

spirit

 

assertion

 

rejection

 

things

 
problem

satisfaction

 

abandoning

 

understanding

 
illegitimate
 
universe
 
finding
 

authorship

 

acknowledge

 
forehead
 

feeling


source

 
perpetual
 
confusion
 
protest
 

assumption

 

capacities

 
overwhelming
 

predominant

 

strenuous

 

vanish