FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
dren born during the year were scarified on the breast, stomach, or arms, to denote their reception as servants of their god. Clavigero, on the other hand, denies that circumcision was ever practiced. It was customary in Mexico, according to most authorities, to take the children while infants to the temple, where the priests made an incision in the ear of the females, and an incision in the ear and prepuce of the males.[18] Grotins and Arias Montan at one time advanced the idea that the western coast of South America was peopled by some mutinous sailors from the fleets of King Solomon, who, in their endeavor to go away far enough to be out of reach, were driven by winds and chance to the Peruvian coast. Others have imagined that some of the lost tribes of Israel found their way eastward to America, by the way of China, to the Mexican coast. The same ideal tradition has made the lost tribes the fathers of the Iroquois Nation in the northeastern parts of the United States. An author, who will be quoted in another part of this work, scouts the idea that the rite, as performed in America, had any connection or common origin with the rite performed in Asia and Africa; but, true to his theory of the climatic causes of the origin of circumcision, he maintains that it originated here as it did elsewhere, being a performance born of climatic necessity. He is, however, dissatisfied with Father Acosta for not being more explicit in relation to the _modus operandi_ of the Mexican circumcision. The want of being explicit, and its consequences in this particular regard, may be inferred from a "Diatribe on Circumcision," by a Mr. Mallet, in an encyclopaedic dictionary of the last century, in which Mr. Mallet informs his readers that Mexicans were in the habit of _cutting off the ears and prepuces_ of the newly born. Herrera and Acosta agree with Clavigero in asserting that the Mexicans simply _bled_ the prepuce. Pierre d'Angleria and other contemporary writers are as emphatic in asserting that in the island of Cosumel, in Yucatan, on the sea-board of the Gulf of Mexico and on the Florida coast, they have observed circumcision by the complete removal of the prepuce with a stone knife. The Spanish monk, Gumilla, relates that the Saliva Indians of the Orinoco circumcised their infants on the eighth day. These Indians also included the females in the observance of the rite. The same author tells us of the barbarous and bloody performanc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

circumcision

 

America

 

prepuce

 

infants

 

explicit

 
Mexican
 

females

 

author

 

asserting

 

incision


Indians
 

tribes

 

climatic

 

Mexicans

 

Clavigero

 

Mallet

 

performed

 
Acosta
 

Mexico

 

origin


Diatribe

 

encyclopaedic

 

dictionary

 

inferred

 

Circumcision

 

dissatisfied

 
Father
 
necessity
 

performance

 
consequences

regard

 

operandi

 

century

 
relation
 

Pierre

 

Spanish

 

Gumilla

 

relates

 
Saliva
 

observed


complete

 

removal

 

Orinoco

 

circumcised

 

barbarous

 

bloody

 
performanc
 
observance
 

included

 

eighth