FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  
Scotch-Irish, with the Anglicans, were the dogmatists of Pennsylvania. The Quakers and Pietistic German sects were anti-dogmatic. Dogmatically adhering to his catechisms, the Scotch-Irishman "resented the aspersions cast upon dogma and creed." The frontier gave him freedom from the Quakers who still considered Presbyterians as those "who had burnt a Quaker in New England from the cart's tail, and had murdered other Quakers." [23] "Mr. Davy's Diary," p. 259. [24] Thomas J. Wertenbaker, _The First Americans, 1607-1690_ (New York, 1927). Wertenbaker's first chapter, "A New World Makes New Men," develops this thesis generally for the American colonial experience, and, as Turner said, those first colonies were the first frontier. [25] Clark, "Pioneer Life in the New Purchase," pp. 28, 63. Clark notes that indentured servitude appeared in Muncy, where Samuel Wallis' great holdings made such service feasible. He also mentions Wallis' ownership of slaves, verified by the Quarter Session Docket of 1778. Wallis freed two Negro slaves, Zell and Chloe, posting a L30 bond that they would not become a charge on the township. [26] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 262. _See also_ Dunaway, _The Scotch-Irish of Colonial Pennsylvania_, pp. 180-200. [27] These "fringe area" participants in Fair Play society actually resided, for the most part, in Provincial territory and hence enjoyed greater stability and more land. [28] Calhoun, _A Social History of the American Family_, I, 207. [29] _Ibid._ [30] Leyburn, _The Scotch-Irish_, p. 271. Leyburn points out that since the Scotch-Irish were never a "minority," in the sense that their values differed radically from the norms of their areas of settlement, they never suffered the normlessness which Durkheim calls anomie--the absence of clear standards to follow. As Leyburn states it, Anomie was an experience unknown to the Scotch-Irishman, for he moved immediately upon arrival to a region where there was neither a settlement nor an established culture. He held land, knew independence, had manifold responsibilities from the very outset. He spoke the language of his neighbors to the East through whose communities he had passed on his way to the frontier. Their institutions and standards differed at only minor points from his own. The Scotch-Irish were not, in short, a "minority group" and needed no Immigrant Aid society to tide them over a peri
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Scotch

 

Leyburn

 

frontier

 
Wallis
 

Quakers

 
standards
 

society

 

Wertenbaker

 
slaves
 
differed

points

 

settlement

 
minority
 
experience
 
American
 

Pennsylvania

 

Irishman

 

Immigrant

 

History

 
Family

Social

 
needed
 

resided

 

fringe

 

participants

 

greater

 
stability
 
values
 

enjoyed

 

Provincial


territory

 

Calhoun

 

arrival

 

region

 

language

 

immediately

 

unknown

 
neighbors
 

independence

 

manifold


responsibilities
 

established

 
culture
 
Anomie
 
suffered
 

normlessness

 

passed

 
radically
 
outset
 

institutions