FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>  
ses are not generated by the pendulum." And finally, Daniell says: "A vibrating body, _before it can act_ as a sounding body, must produce alternate compressions and rarefactions in the air, and these must be well marked. If, however, the vibrating body be so small that at each oscillation the surrounding air has time to _flow round_ it, there is at every oscillation a local rearrangement--a local flow and reflow of the air; but the air at a distance is almost wholly unaffected by this." Now, as Prof. Carter has shown by experiment that a tuning fork _while still sounding_ had only an amplitude of swing of 1/17000 of an inch, and only traveled an aggregate distance of 1/33 of an inch in one second, or one inch in 33 seconds, surely such a motion is neither "swift," "fast," nor "vehement," and is unquestionably much "slower" than the motion of a pendulum. We have only to consider one forward motion of the prong, and if that motion cannot condense the air, then no wave can be produced; for after a prong has advanced and stopped moving (no matter for how short a time), if it has not compressed the air, its return motion (on the same side) cannot do anything toward making a compression. If one such motion of 1/17000 of an inch in 1/512 of a second cannot compress the air, then the remaining motions cannot. There is unquestionably a "union limit" between mobility and compressibility, and unless this limit is passed, mobility holds sway and prevents condensation or compression of the air; but when this limit is passed by the exercise of sufficient energy, then compression of the air results. Just imagine the finger to be moved through the air at a velocity of one foot in one hour; is it possible that any scientist who considers the problem in connection with the mobility of the air, could risk his reputation by saying that the air would be compressed? Heretofore it was supposed that a praeong of a tuning fork was traveling _fast_ because it vibrated so many times in a second, never stopping to think that its velocity of motion was entirely dependent upon the distance it traveled. At the start the prong travels 1/20 of an inch, but in a short time, _while still sounding_, the distance is reduced to 1/17000 of an inch. While the first motion was quite fast, about 25 inches in a second, the last motion was only about 1/33 of an inch in the same time, and is consequently 825 times slower motion. The momentum of the prong, the amou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>  



Top keywords:

motion

 
distance
 

mobility

 

compression

 
sounding
 

tuning

 

passed

 
unquestionably
 

vibrating

 

pendulum


velocity

 

slower

 

traveled

 

compressed

 

oscillation

 
finger
 

prevents

 

condensation

 

energy

 

scientist


results
 

compressibility

 

imagine

 
exercise
 

sufficient

 

travels

 

reduced

 

dependent

 

momentum

 

inches


stopping

 

reputation

 

considers

 

problem

 

connection

 
vibrated
 
traveling
 

Heretofore

 
supposed
 

praeong


forward

 

rearrangement

 
surrounding
 
reflow
 
Carter
 

experiment

 
wholly
 
unaffected
 
marked
 

finally