FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>   >|  
n average, 250,000; immediately before the first Punic war, 280,000 to 290,000. These numbers are certain enough, but they are not quite available historically for another reason, namely, that in them probably the Roman full burgesses and the "burgesses without vote" not serving, like the Campanians, in legions of their own, --such, e. g., as the Caerites, --are included together in the reckoning, while the latter must at any rate -de facto- be counted among the subjects (Rom. Forsch. ii. 396). 40. II. VI. Battle of Sentinum 41. II. VII. Commencement of the Conflict in Lower Italy 42. II. VII. Quaestors of the Fleet 43. Not merely in every Latin one; for the censorship or so-called -quinquennalitas- occurs, as is well known, also among communities whose constitution was not formed according to the Latin scheme. 44. This earliest boundary is probably indicated by the two small townships -Ad fines-, of which one lay north of Arezzo on the road to Florence, the second on the coast not far from Leghorn. Somewhat further to the south of the latter, the brook and valley of Vada are still called -Fiume della fine-, -Valle della fine- (Targioni Tozzetti, Viaggj, iv. 430). 45. In strict official language, indeed, this was not the case. The fullest designation of the Italians occurs in the agrarian law of 643, line 21; -[ceivis] Romanus sociumve nominisve Latini, quibus ex formula togatorum [milites in terra Italia imperare solent]-; in like manner at the 29th line of the same -peregrinus- is distinguished from the -Latinus-, and in the decree of the senate as to the Bacchanalia in 568 the expression is used: -ne quis ceivis Romanus neve nominis Latini neve socium quisquam-. But in common use very frequently the second or third of these three subdivisions is omitted, and along with the Romans sometimes only those Latini nominis are mentioned, sometimes only the -socii- (Weissenborn on Liv. xxii. 50, 6), while there is no difference in the meaning. The designation -homines nominis Latini ac socii Italici- (Sallust. Jug. 40), correct as it is in itself, is foreign to the official -usus loquendi, which knows -Italia-, but not -Italici-. CHAPTER VIII Law, Religion, Military System, Economic Condition, Nationality Development of Law In the development which law underwent during this period within the Roman community, probably the most important material innovation was that peculiar control whic
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Latini
 

nominis

 
Italici
 

official

 
Italia
 

ceivis

 

Romanus

 
called
 

occurs

 

designation


burgesses
 

decree

 

senate

 

expression

 

Bacchanalia

 
agrarian
 

sociumve

 
nominisve
 
Italians
 

fullest


strict

 

language

 

quibus

 

formula

 

peregrinus

 

distinguished

 

manner

 

solent

 

togatorum

 

milites


imperare
 

Latinus

 

Romans

 
Religion
 

Military

 

System

 

Condition

 

Economic

 
CHAPTER
 
foreign

loquendi

 

Nationality

 
Development
 

material

 

important

 

innovation

 

peculiar

 

control

 

community

 

underwent