FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659  
1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   >>   >|  
ns for the Bed of justice continued to be actively but silently made during the next few days. In the course of the numberless discussions which arose upon the subject, it was agreed, after much opposition on my part, to strike a blow, not only at the Parliament, but at M. du Maine, who had fomented its discontent. M. le Duc, who had been admitted to our councils, and who was heart and soul against the bastards, proposed that at the Bed of justice the education of the young King should be taken out of the control of M. du Maine and placed in his hands. He proposed also that the title of Prince of the Blood should be taken from him, with all the privileges it conferred, and that he should be reduced to the rank of a simple Duke and Peer, taking his place among the rest according to the date of his erection; thus, at a bound, going down to the bottom of the peerage! Should these memoirs ever see the light, every one who reads them will be able to judge how such a proposition as this harmonised with my personal wishes. I had seen the bastards grow in rank and importance with an indignation and disgust I could scarcely contain. I had seen favour after favour heaped upon them by the late King, until he crowned all by elevating them to the rank of Princes of the Blood in defiance of all law, of all precedent, of all decency, if I must say the word. What I felt at this accumulation of honours I have more than once expressed; what I did to oppose such monstrous innovations has also been said. No man could be more against M. du Maine than I, and yet I opposed this proposition of M. le Duc because I thought one blow was enough at a time, and that it might be dangerous to attempt the two at once. M. du Maine had supporters, nay; he was at the head of a sort of party; strip him of the important post he held, and what might not his rake, his disappointment, and his wounded ambition lead him to attempt? Civil war, perhaps, would be the result of his disgrace. Again and again I urged these views, not only upon M. le Duc d'Orleans, but upon M. le Duc. Nay, with this latter I had two long stolen interviews in the Tuileries Gardens, where we spoke without constraint, and exhausted all our arguments. But M. le Duc was not to be shaken, and as I could do no more than I had done to move him, I was obliged at last to give in. It was resolved, however, that disgrace should fall upon M. du Maine alone; that his brother, the Comte de Toulouse
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659  
1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

proposed

 

proposition

 
bastards
 

attempt

 

disgrace

 

justice

 

favour

 
supporters
 

oppose

 

honours


expressed

 

dangerous

 

monstrous

 

innovations

 

opposed

 
accumulation
 

Toulouse

 
thought
 

result

 

exhausted


constraint

 

arguments

 

shaken

 
Tuileries
 

Gardens

 

resolved

 
brother
 

obliged

 
interviews
 

stolen


ambition
 
wounded
 
disappointment
 
Orleans
 

decency

 

important

 

education

 

councils

 

admitted

 

Parliament


fomented

 
discontent
 

control

 

privileges

 

conferred

 

reduced

 

Prince

 
strike
 
silently
 

continued