FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  
ples which they contain? This has sometimes been done, and we have seen people declare that as they no longer believed in the various religions so they despised morality and boldly proclaimed the maxim of bourgeois selfishness, "Everyone for himself." But a Society, human or animal, cannot exist without certain rules and moral habits springing up within it; religion may go, morality remains. If we were to come to consider that a man did well in lying, deceiving his neighbours, or plundering them when possible (this is the middle-class business morality), we should come to such a pass that we could no longer live together. You might assure me of your friendship, but perhaps you might only do so in order to rob me more easily; you might promise to do a certain thing for me, only to deceive me; you might promise to forward a letter for me, and you might steal it just like an ordinary governor of a jail. Under such conditions society would become impossible, and this is so generally understood that the repudiation of religions in no way prevents public morality from being maintained, developed, and raised to a higher and ever higher standard. This fact is so striking that philosophers seek to explain it by the principles of utilitarianism, and recently Spencer sought to base the morality which exists among us upon physiological causes and the needs connected with the preservation of the race. Let me give you an example in order to explain to you what _we_ think on the matter. A child is drowning, and four men who stand upon the bank see it struggling in the water. One of them does not stir, he is a partisan of "Each one for himself," the maxim of the commercial middle-class; this one is a brute and we need not speak of him further. The next one reasons thus: "If I save the child, a good report of my action will be made to the ruler of heaven, and the Creator will reward me by increasing my flocks and my serfs," and thereupon he plunges into the water. Is he therefore a moral man? Clearly not! He is a shrewd calculator, that is all. The third, who is an utilitarian, reflects thus (or at least utilitarian philosophers represent him as so reasoning): "Pleasures can be classed in two categories, inferior pleasures and higher ones. To save the life of anyone is a superior pleasure infinitely more intense and more durable than others; therefore I will save the child." Admitting that any man ever reasoned thus, would he not b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  



Top keywords:

morality

 

higher

 

middle

 
utilitarian
 
explain
 

promise

 

religions

 
longer
 

philosophers

 

commercial


preservation

 

physiological

 

connected

 
matter
 

struggling

 

partisan

 

drowning

 
Creator
 

pleasures

 
inferior

categories

 
reasoning
 

Pleasures

 

classed

 
superior
 

Admitting

 

reasoned

 

pleasure

 

infinitely

 

intense


durable

 

represent

 

reward

 

heaven

 
increasing
 

flocks

 
reasons
 
report
 
action
 

plunges


reflects

 

calculator

 

shrewd

 
Clearly
 

prevents

 

remains

 

religion

 
habits
 

springing

 
business