FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  
great mass of women throughout the country who do not wish for it, to gratify the comparatively few who do. It has been strongly urged that without the right of suffrage, women are, and will be, subjected to great oppression and injustice. But every one who has examined the subject at all knows that, without female suffrage, legislation for years has improved and is still improving the condition of woman. The disabilities imposed upon her by the common law have, one by one, been swept away, until in most of the States she has the full right to her property and all, or nearly all, the rights which can be granted without impairing or destroying the marriage relation. These changes have been wrought by the spirit of the age, and are not, generally at least, the result of any agitation by women in their own behalf. Nor can women justly complain of any partiality in the administration of justice. They have the sympathy of judges and particularly of juries to an extent which would warrant loud complaint on the part of their adversaries of the sterner sex. Their appeals to legislatures against injustice are never unheeded, and there is no doubt that when any considerable part of the women of any State really wish for the right to vote, it will be granted without the intervention of congress. Any State may grant the right of suffrage to women. Some of them have done so to a limited extent, and perhaps with good results. It is evident that in some States public opinion is much more strongly in favor of it than it is in others. Your committee regard it as unwise and inexpedient to enable three-fourths in number of the States, through an amendment to the national constitution, to force woman suffrage upon the other fourth in which the public opinion of both sexes may be strongly adverse to such a change. For these reasons, your committee report back said resolution with a recommendation that it be indefinitely postponed. This adverse report was all the more disappointing because Mr. Wadleigh, as Mrs. Clemmer's letter states, filled the place of Hon. Oliver P. Morton of Indiana, one of the most steadfast friends of woman suffrage, who, at the last session of congress, had asked as a special favor the reference of our petitions to the Committee on Pri
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

suffrage

 

States

 

strongly

 

report

 

granted

 

extent

 
committee
 

opinion

 
public
 
congress

adverse

 
injustice
 
amendment
 

fourths

 
inexpedient
 

number

 
constitution
 

unwise

 
enable
 

national


limited

 
results
 

evident

 

regard

 

fourth

 

reasons

 

filled

 

states

 

letter

 

Clemmer


Oliver

 

friends

 

session

 
steadfast
 
Indiana
 

Morton

 

reference

 

special

 

Wadleigh

 

change


petitions

 

disappointing

 
postponed
 

resolution

 
recommendation
 
indefinitely
 

Committee

 
warrant
 
common
 

disabilities