FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  
earted pastime it offers little but opportunities for misunderstanding, general conversation, allegations of unfairness, and disappointment. "Suggestions" ought to be played like this: You sit in a semicircle and the first player says something--anything--a single word. Let us suppose it is (as it probably will be in thousands of cases) "MARGOT." The next player has to say what "MARGOT" suggests--"reticence," for example--and the next player, shutting his mind completely to the word "MARGOT," has to say what "reticence" suggests--perhaps _Grimaud_, in _The Three Musketeers_--and the fourth player has to disregard "reticence" and announce whatever mental reaction the name of _Grimaud_ produces. It maybe that he has never heard of _Grimaud_ and the similarity of sound suggests only GRIMALDI the clown. Then he ought to say, "GRIMALDI the clown," which might in its turn suggest "melancholy" or "the circus." All the time no one should speak but the players in their turn, and they should speak instantly and should say nothing but the thing that is honestly suggested by the previous word. At the end of, say, a dozen rounds the process of unwinding the coil begins, each player in rotation taking part in the backward process until "MARGOT" is again reached. That is how the game should be played. This is how it _is_ played:-- _First Player._ Let me see; what shall I say? _Various other Players_ (_together_). Surely there's no difficulty in beginning? Say "anything," etc., etc. _A Player_ (_looking round_). Say--say "fireplace." _First Player._ But that's so silly. _Master of Ceremonies_ (_who wishes he had never proposed the game_). It doesn't matter. All that is needed is a start. _Another player._ Say "MARGOT." (_Roars of laughter._) _All._ Oh, yes, say "MARGOT." _First Player._ Very well, then--"MARGOT." (_More laughter._) _Second Player_ (_trying to be clever_). "Reticence." (_Shouts of laughter._) _Other Players._ How could "MARGOT" suggest "reticence"? _M. C._ Never mind; the point is that it did. Now then--and please everyone be silent--now, then, Third Player? _Third Player._ "Audacity." _M. C._ I'm afraid you're not playing quite fairly. You see "reticence" cannot suggest "audacity." The First Player's word not impossibly might. Could it be that you were still thinking of that? _Third Player._ I'm sorry. But "reticence" doesn't suggest anything. _Other Players_ (_together_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  



Top keywords:

Player

 
MARGOT
 

reticence

 

player

 

suggest

 

Grimaud

 
suggests
 

laughter

 

played

 

Players


GRIMALDI

 

process

 

proposed

 
wishes
 
Various
 

Ceremonies

 

fireplace

 

beginning

 

difficulty

 

Surely


Master
 

Reticence

 
afraid
 

playing

 
Audacity
 
silent
 

fairly

 

thinking

 

audacity

 
impossibly

needed
 
Another
 
Second
 
Shouts
 

clever

 

matter

 

thousands

 

shutting

 

suppose

 
completely

announce

 

mental

 

disregard

 
fourth
 

Musketeers

 

single

 

misunderstanding

 
general
 

conversation

 

opportunities