FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   >>  
rue, if all are fools with thee, who can be wise? Nor will virginity be commendable, for if all be virgins, and none marry, the human race will perish. Virtue is rare, and is not desired by many." It is therefore evident that this is a foolish alarm; thus might a man fear to draw water lest the river run dry. [*St. Thomas gives no reply to the third objection, which is sufficiently solved in the body of the article.] _______________________ EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 189, Art. 8] Whether It Is Lawful to Pass from One Religious Order to Another? Objection 1: It seems unlawful to pass from one religious order to another, even a stricter one. For the Apostle says (Heb. 10:25): "Not forsaking our assembly, as some are accustomed"; and a gloss observes: "Those namely who yield through fear of persecution, or who presuming on themselves withdraw from the company of sinners or of the imperfect, that they may appear to be righteous." Now those who pass from one religious order to another more perfect one would seem to do this. Therefore this is seemingly unlawful. Obj. 2: Further, the profession of monks is stricter than that of canons regular (Extra, De Statu Monach. et Canonic. Reg., cap. Quod Dei timorem). But it is unlawful for anyone to pass from the state of canon regular to the monastic state. For it is said in the Decretals (XIX, qu. iii, can. Mandamus): "We ordain and without any exception forbid any professed canon regular to become a monk, unless (which God forbid) he have fallen into public sin." Therefore it would seem unlawful for anyone to pass from one religious order to another of higher rank. Obj. 3: Further, a person is bound to fulfil what he has vowed, as long as he is able lawfully to do so; thus if a man has vowed to observe continence, he is bound, even after contracting marriage by words in the present tense, to fulfil his vow so long as the marriage is not consummated, because he can fulfil the vow by entering religion. Therefore if a person may lawfully pass from one religious order to another, he will be bound to do so if he vowed it previously while in the world. But this would seem objectionable, since in many cases it might give rise to scandal. Therefore a religious may not pass from one religious order to another stricter one. _On the contrary,_ It is said in the Decretals (XX, qu. iv, can. Virgines): "If sacred virgins design for the good of their soul to pass to another monastery
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   >>  



Top keywords:

religious

 
unlawful
 

Therefore

 

regular

 

fulfil

 

stricter

 

lawfully

 

Decretals

 

person

 
marriage

virgins

 

forbid

 

Further

 

ordain

 

exception

 
monastic
 

Mandamus

 
sacred
 

canons

 

monastery


Monach
 
professed
 
timorem
 

Canonic

 

design

 

contracting

 

present

 

continence

 

observe

 

previously


religion
 

consummated

 

entering

 
objectionable
 

contrary

 

Virgines

 

fallen

 

scandal

 
higher
 
public

presuming
 

objection

 
Thomas
 

sufficiently

 

solved

 

Whether

 

ARTICLE

 

article

 

EIGHTH

 

virginity