FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797  
798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   >>   >|  
FIRST-FRUITS (In Four Articles) We must next consider oblations and first-fruits. Under this head there are four points of inquiry: (1) Whether any oblations are necessary as a matter of precept? (2) To whom are oblations due? (3) of what things they should be made? (4) In particular, as to first-fruits, whether men are bound to offer them? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 86, Art. 1] Whether Men Are Under a Necessity of Precept to Make Oblations? Objection 1: It would seem that men are not bound by precept to make oblations. Men are not bound, at the time of the Gospel, to observe the ceremonial precepts of the Old Law, as stated above (I-II, Q. 103, AA. 3, 4). Now the offering of oblations is one of the ceremonial precepts of the Old Law, since it is written (Ex. 23:14): "Three times every year you shall celebrate feasts with Me," and further on (Ex. 23:15): "Thou shalt not appear empty before Me." Therefore men are not now under a necessity of precept to make oblations. Obj. 2: Further, before they are made, oblations depend on man's will, as appears from our Lord's saying (Matt. 5:23), "If . . . thou offer thy gift at the altar," as though this were left to the choice of the offerer: and when once oblations have been made, there is no way of offering them again. Therefore in no way is a man under a necessity of precept to make oblations. Obj. 3: Further, if anyone is bound to give a certain thing to the Church, and fails to give it, he can be compelled to do so by being deprived of the Church's sacraments. But it would seem unlawful to refuse the sacraments of the Church to those who refuse to make oblations according to a decree of the sixth council [*Can. Trullan, xxiii, quoted I, qu. i, can. Nullus]: "Let none who dispense Holy Communion exact anything of the recipient, and if they exact anything let them be deposed." Therefore it is not necessary that men should make oblations. _On the contrary,_ Gregory says [*Gregory VII; Concil. Roman. v, can. xii]: "Let every Christian take care that he offer something to God at the celebration of Mass." _I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 85, A. 3, ad 3), the term "oblation" is common to all things offered for the Divine worship, so that if a thing be offered to be destroyed in worship of God, as though it were being made into something holy, it is both an oblation and a sacrifice. Wherefore it is written (Ex. 29:18): "Thou sha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797  
798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

oblations

 

precept

 

Therefore

 

Church

 

stated

 

Further

 

Gregory

 
offering
 
necessity
 
written

ceremonial

 

precepts

 

Whether

 

worship

 

fruits

 

sacraments

 

refuse

 

things

 
offered
 

oblation


quoted

 

unlawful

 

deprived

 
compelled
 

Trullan

 

council

 

decree

 

common

 
Divine
 

destroyed


Wherefore

 

sacrifice

 

answer

 

deposed

 
recipient
 
Communion
 

dispense

 

contrary

 

celebration

 

Christian


Concil

 

Nullus

 

Precept

 

Oblations

 
Necessity
 

ARTICLE

 

Objection

 

Gospel

 
observe
 

FRUITS