FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  
vantageous even if the other cross was fertile: and just as characters now co-ordinated may have been separately accumulated by Natural Selection, so the reciprocal crosses may have become sterile one at a time. LETTER 212. TO A.R. WALLACE. 4, Chester Place, March 17th, 1868. (212/1. Mr. Darwin had already written a short note to Mr. Wallace expressing a general dissent from his view.) I do not feel that I shall grapple with the sterility argument till my return home; I have tried once or twice, and it has made my stomach feel as if it had been placed in a vice. Your paper has driven three of my children half mad--one sat up till 12 o'clock over it. My second son, the mathematician, thinks that you have omitted one almost inevitable deduction which apparently would modify the result. He has written out what he thinks, but I have not tried fully to understand him. I suppose that you do not care enough about the subject to like to see what he has written. LETTER 212A. A.R. WALLACE TO CHARLES DARWIN. Hurstpierpoint, March, 24th [1868]. I return your son's notes with my notes on them. Without going into any details, is not this a strong general argument? 1. A species varies occasionally in two directions, but owing to their free intercrossing the varieties never increase. 2. A change of conditions occurs which threatens the existence of the species; but the two varieties are adapted to the changing conditions, and if accumulated will form two new species adapted to the new conditions. 3. Free crossing, however, renders this impossible, and so the species is in danger of extinction. 4. If sterility would be induced, then the pure races would increase more rapidly, and replace the old species. 5. It is admitted that partial sterility between varieties does occasionally occur. It is admitted [that] the degree of this sterility varies; is it not probable that Natural Selection can accumulate these variations, and thus save the species? If Natural Selection can NOT do this, how do species ever arise, except when a variety is isolated? Closely allied species in distinct countries being sterile is no difficulty; for either they diverged from a common ancestor in contact, and Natural Selection increased the sterility, or they were isolated, and have varied since: in which case they have been for ages influenced by distinct conditions which may well produce sterility. If the difficulty of grafting was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
species
 

sterility

 

Selection

 

Natural

 

conditions

 

written

 

varieties

 

distinct

 

adapted

 

argument


return
 

admitted

 
difficulty
 

isolated

 

varies

 

occasionally

 

increase

 

thinks

 

sterile

 

WALLACE


LETTER

 
general
 

accumulated

 

characters

 
induced
 

partial

 

extinction

 
rapidly
 

replace

 

occurs


threatens

 

existence

 

ordinated

 

change

 

separately

 

changing

 

crossing

 

renders

 

impossible

 
danger

fertile

 
diverged
 
common
 

ancestor

 

contact

 

vantageous

 

increased

 

produce

 

grafting

 

influenced