FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>  
ocal influence has nothing whatever to do. It is wholly, absolutely, and unreservedly under the direction and control of the central authority. "In England, I may observe, the state assumes no such power. The training institutions for schoolmasters are left entirely under the control of the authorities of the respective denominations. In Ireland, the rule is that the masters should be trained by government, and accept at once their theology, their morals, and their science of teaching at the hands of the officials of the state. It is only the resolute opposition of the Catholic prelates that has prevented this project from being completely carried into effect"--(p. 87-96.) We regret that our space will not allow us to give more copious extracts from the book now before us. But again we recommend our readers to read and study the whole treatise. It will open their eyes to the dangers with which mixed education, falsely called _national_, menaces our Church and our country. FOOTNOTES: [30] Mr. Butt's work is entitled _The Liberty of Teaching Vindicated, Reflections and Proposals on the subject of National Education_. Dublin. Kelly, Grafton Street, 1865. LITURGICAL QUESTIONS. The few questions which were answered in the last number of the _Record_ have given occasion to other questions of a practical nature in connection with the Office and Mass for the Dead. There is a variety of practice in some points--for instance, 1st, at the end of the absolution, if the office and mass be celebrated for one person, should _requiescat in pace_, or _requiescant_, be said? 2nd, Should the _Anima ejus et animae omnium_, etc., be said, and is there any definite rule about it? 3rd, When is the _De profundis_ to be said, and when is it to be omitted? With regard to the first question we beg to quote the following decree of the Sacred Congregation of Rites, which settles the question. "Dec. 2709. An dicendum sit in fine absolutionis mortuorum requiescat vel requiescant? "Resp. Quando absolutio est pro uno defuncto, in singulari; pro pluribus, in plurali. In missa vero semper _requiescant_. Die 22 Januarii, 1678". In reply to the second question, it appears to us that the Rubrics of the Ritual will lead us to a safe conclusion. The Ritual clearly lays down that, if the remains for any reason are not carried to the cemeter
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>  



Top keywords:
question
 

requiescant

 

requiescat

 
carried
 

Ritual

 

questions

 
control
 

person

 

definite

 
Should

animae

 

omnium

 

occasion

 
practical
 
nature
 

connection

 

answered

 

number

 
Record
 

Office


absolution

 

office

 

celebrated

 

instance

 

points

 

variety

 

practice

 

semper

 

Januarii

 

plurali


defuncto

 

singulari

 
pluribus
 

remains

 

reason

 
cemeter
 

conclusion

 

appears

 

Rubrics

 

absolutio


Quando

 

decree

 
Sacred
 

regard

 

profundis

 
omitted
 

Congregation

 
absolutionis
 
mortuorum
 
dicendum