FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  
."[1] Moreover, "the evidence of open-mindedness can not stand against the many instances of absolute refusal to permit argument against slavery. In the Colonial Congress, in the Confederation, in the Constitutional Convention, in the state ratifying conventions, in the early Congresses, there were many vehement denunciations of anything which seemed to have an anti-slavery tendency, and wholesale suspicion of the North at all times when the subject was opened."[2] One can not forget the effort of James G. Birney, or that Benjamin Lundy's work was most largely done in what we should now call the South, or that between 1815 and 1828 at least four journals which avowed the extinction of slavery as one, if not the chief one, of their objects were published in the Southern states.[3] Only gradual emancipation, however, found any real support in the South; and, as compared with the work of Garrison, even that of Lundy appears in the distance with something of the mildness of "sweetness and light." Even before the rise of Garrison, Robert James Turnbull of South Carolina, under the name of "Brutus," wrote a virulent attack on anti-slavery; and Representative Drayton of the same state, speaking in Congress in 1828, said, "Much as we love our country, we would rather see our cities in flames, our plains drenched in blood--rather endure all the calamities of civil war, than parley for an instant upon the right of any power, than our own to interfere with the regulation of our slaves."[4] More and more this was to be the real sentiment of the South, and in the face of this kind of eloquence and passion mere academic discussion was powerless. [Footnote 1: Adams: _The Neglected Period of Anti-Slavery, 1808-1831_, 250-251.] [Footnote 2: _Ibid_., 110.] [Footnote 3: William Birney: _James G. Birney and His Times_, 85-86.] [Footnote 4: Register of Debates, _4,975_, cited by Adams, 112-3.] The _Liberator_ was begun January 1, 1831. The next year Garrison was the leading spirit in the formation of the New England Anti-Slavery Society; and in December, 1833, in Philadelphia, the American Anti-Slavery Society was organized. In large measure these organizations were an outgrowth of the great liberal and humanitarian spirit that by 1830 had become manifest in both Europe and America. Hugo and Mazzini, Byron and Macaulay had all now appeared upon the scene, and romanticism was regnant. James Montgomery and William Faber wrote their
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slavery

 

Footnote

 
Garrison
 

Slavery

 
Birney
 

spirit

 

Society

 

William

 

Congress

 

Period


Neglected

 
sentiment
 

instant

 

interfere

 
parley
 
endure
 
calamities
 

regulation

 

slaves

 
passion

eloquence
 

academic

 

discussion

 

powerless

 
humanitarian
 
manifest
 

liberal

 

measure

 

organizations

 

outgrowth


Europe
 

America

 

romanticism

 

regnant

 

Montgomery

 

appeared

 

Mazzini

 

Macaulay

 

organized

 
Debates

Liberator

 
Register
 
drenched
 

January

 

December

 
Philadelphia
 

American

 
England
 

leading

 
formation