etud en que les dexo Carlos segundo. V. E. asegure a su Santidad que
mas sacare del Principe para los Catolicos que pudiera sacar del Rey."]
[Footnote 623: On December 13/23. 1688, the Admiral of Castile gave his
opinion thus: "Esta materia es de calidad que no puede dexar de padecer
nuestra sagrada religion o el servicio de V. M.; porque, si e1 Principe
de Orange tiene buenos succesos, nos aseguraremos de Franceses, pero
peligrara la religion." The Council was much pleased on February 16/26
by a letter of the Prince, in which he promised "que los Catolicos
que se portaren con prudencia no sean molestados, y gocen libertad de
conciencia, por ser contra su dictamen el forzar ni castigar por esta
razon a nadie."]
[Footnote 624: In the chapter of La Bruyere, entitled "Sur les
Jugemens," is a passage which deserves to be read, as showing in
what light our revolution appeared to a Frenchman of distinguished
abilities.]
[Footnote 625: My account of the reception of James and his wife in
France is taken chiefly from the letters of Madame de Sevigne and the
Memoirs of Dangeau.]
[Footnote 626: Albeville to Preston, Nov 23/Dec 3 1688, in the
Mackintosh Collection.]
[Footnote 627: "'Tis hier nu Hosanna: maar 't zal, veelligt, haast
Kruist hem kruist hem, zyn." Witsen, MS. in Wagenaar, book lxi. It is
an odd coincidence that, a very few years before, Richard Duke, a Tory
poet, once well known, but now scarcely remembered except by Johnson's
biographical sketch, had used exactly the same illustration about James
"Was not of old the Jewish rabble's cry,
Hosannah first, and after crucify?"
--The Review.
Despatch of the Dutch Ambassadors Extraordinary, Jan. 8/18. 1689;
Citters, same date.]
[Footnote 628: London Gazette, Jan. 7. 1688/9.]
[Footnote 629: The Sixth Collection of Papers, 1689; Wodrow, III. xii.
4. App. 150, 151; Faithful Contendings Displayed; Burnet, i. 804.]
[Footnote 630: Perth to Lady Errol, Dec. 29. 1688; to Melfort, Dec. 21.
1688; Sixth Collection of Papers, 1689.]
[Footnote 631: Burnet, i. 805.; Sixth Collection of Papers, 1689.]
[Footnote 632: Albeville, Nov. 9/19. 1688.]
[Footnote 633: See the pamphlet entitled Letter to a Member of the
Convention, and the answer, 1689; Burnet, i. 809.]
[Footnote 634: Letter to the Lords of the Council, Jan. 4/14. 1688/9;
Clarendon's Diary, Jan 9/19]
[Footnote 635: It seems incredible that any man should really have
been imposed upo
|