FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  
eedingly numerous and, as I have already stated, have proved of the highest value to astronomers who have been called upon to investigate the ancient history of Comets. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 19: _Memoirs_, R.A.S., vol. xi. p. 47.] [Footnote 20: Republished in the _Observatory_ Magazine, vol. xviii. p. 323, _et seq._, 1895.] [Footnote 21: A good deal of information respecting Chinese eclipse records, so far as known up to the beginning of the 19th-century, will be found in Delambre's _Histoire de l'Astronomie Ancienne_. Paris, 1817.] [Footnote 22: _Month. Not._, R.A.S., vol. xxiv. p. 41.] CHAPTER IX. ARE ECLIPSES ALLUDED TO IN THE BIBLE? An interesting question has been suggested: Are there any allusions to eclipses to be found in Holy Scripture? It seems safe to assert that there is at least one, and that there may be three or four. In Amos viii. 9 we read:--"I will cause the Sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the Earth in the clear day." This language is so very explicit and applies so precisely to the circumstances of a solar eclipse that commentators are generally agreed that it can have but one meaning;[23] and accordingly it is considered to refer without doubt to one or other of the following eclipses:--791 B.C., 771 B.C., 770 B.C., or 763 B.C. Archbishop Usher,[24] the well-known chronologist, suggested the first three more than two centuries ago, whilst the eclipse of 763 B.C. was suggested in recent times and is now generally accepted as the one referred to. The circumstances connected with the discovery and identification of the eclipse of 763 B.C. are very interesting. The date when Amos wrote is set down in the margin of our Bibles as 787 B.C. and if this date is correct it follows that for his statement to have been a prediction he must be alluding to some eclipse of later date than 787 B.C. This obvious assumption not only shuts out the eclipse of 791 B.C., but opens the door to the acceptance of the eclipse of 763 B.C. Apparently the first modern writer who looked into the matter after Archbishop Usher was the German commentator Hitzig who suggested the eclipse of Feb. 9, 784 B.C. Dr. Pusey was so far taken with this idea that he thought it worth while to secure the co-operation of the Rev. R. Main, F.R.A.S., the Radcliffe Observer at Oxford, for the purpose of a full investigation. Mr.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

eclipse

 

Footnote

 

suggested

 

eclipses

 

interesting

 

circumstances

 

generally

 

Archbishop

 

proved

 

identification


discovery

 

connected

 

highest

 

margin

 

Bibles

 

numerous

 

statement

 

prediction

 
correct
 

referred


stated

 
accepted
 

investigate

 

chronologist

 

ancient

 

history

 

FOOTNOTES

 

Comets

 

astronomers

 
recent

whilst
 

called

 

centuries

 

eedingly

 
alluding
 
secure
 
thought
 

operation

 
purpose
 

investigation


Oxford

 

Observer

 

Radcliffe

 

Hitzig

 

assumption

 

obvious

 

acceptance

 

matter

 

German

 

commentator