6] That stones were used, both in offensive as well as in defensive
warfare, is proven by Castaneda, ii. cap. v. p. 178; i. cap. xii. p. 69.
It is possible that the pebbles used were kept on the roofs, as was the
custom among the ancient Mexicans.
[187] Thus the probability of the destruction of a part of Pecos by the
Tanos, on the 10th of August, 1680, is still further increased.
[188] Therefore the massacre of all their available men by the
Comanches, already mentioned. I could not as yet find the date of the
event. It is a well-known tradition, however. It occurred in the _moro_.
[189] That constant guard was kept on the housetops is stated by
Castaneda, ii. p. 179.
[190] The defensive constructions of the pueblos, as late as 1540, were
the houses. The wall of Pecos is an exception. Castaneda says (i. cap.
xiv. p. 80): "As these villages have no streets, that all the houses are
of the same height and common to all the inhabitants, these large houses
must be captured first, because they are the points of defence."
[191] The church of Pecos, although it had lost all its former splendor,
still was used till about 1840. Afterwards it was abandoned.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Transcriber's Note |
| Every effort has been made to replicate this text as faithfully as |
| possible, including obsolete and variant spellings and other |
| inconsistencies. |
| |
| Minor punctuation and printing errors have been corrected. |
| |
| The Google Print source suffers from numerous gaps in the text. |
| A copy of the original text obtained from the library at the |
| College of Santa Fe (New Mexico) enabled the transcriber to include|
| all omitted pages and plates for this complete transcription. |
| |
| Footnotes occurring on each page of the original text are grouped |
| at the end of the two major sections of the transcribed text, |
| |
| Hyphen use in directional terms is now consistent throughout the |
| author's text. For example, occurrences of 'northeast' are now |
| 'nor
|