FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238  
239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>   >|  
tend the Council of State at Whitehall on the following afternoon, when they were formally thanked for the support they had given to parliament and encouraged to continue in the same course.(1106) (M558) (M559) Nevertheless, when the danger was over the House thought fit to run the risk of alienating the favour of the City by an attempt to force the re-election of John Ireton as mayor for the coming year upon the unwilling citizens. On the 2nd September the House resolved that "John Ireton" [thus ignoring his knighthood], then lord mayor of the city of London, should continue to execute the office of lord mayor for the year ensuing, and ordered "that it be recommended to the city of London to see the same done accordingly."(1107) The Common Council being in no mood to comply with such request drew up a long petition to parliament,(1108) in which the government of the city was shown to depend upon "two strong supports," viz., the customs of the city and its charters, confirmed as they had been by divers Acts of Parliament; that by virtue of these charters and customs the mayor was chosen by the citizens, that he remained in office for no more than one year, and was presented to the supreme power of the nation for approbation. The petition went on to remind the House how on various occasions, and notably on the 13th January, 1644, and the 6th and 18th May of the same year, parliament had formally acknowledged the constant affection and assistance it had received from the city, and concluded by praying the House to lay no restraint upon the free election of their mayor by the citizens nor infringe the ancient customs and charters of the city, a breach of which "would exceedingly hazard, if not totally destroy, the peace, good order and happiness of the most ancient and well governed city" in the nation, if not in the whole world. (M560) The House taking this petition into consideration on the 28th September--the day preceding that on which the election was to take place--resolved by thirty-eight votes to thirteen "that the city of London be left at liberty to make choice of their mayor according to their charter, notwithstanding the previous vote of the House of the 2nd September instant."(1109) The citizens thereupon showed their independence by electing Thomas Aleyne. (M561) A good understanding or "correspondence" between parliament and the city having thus been arrived at, the Common Council resolved to a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238  
239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

parliament

 

citizens

 

September

 

resolved

 
election
 
Council
 

London

 

petition

 

customs

 

charters


Ireton

 

ancient

 

nation

 

office

 

Common

 

formally

 

continue

 
infringe
 

restraint

 

correspondence


breach
 
understanding
 

Aleyne

 

totally

 

hazard

 

exceedingly

 

January

 
arrived
 

occasions

 

notably


concluded

 
praying
 

received

 
assistance
 

acknowledged

 

constant

 
affection
 
destroy
 

notwithstanding

 

charter


preceding

 

previous

 

consideration

 

choice

 

thirty

 

thirteen

 
liberty
 

instant

 
governed
 

independence