ich include nine instances of Leprosy,
recorded in the Old Testament:--
Moses--Exodus, iv., 6. }
Miriam--Numbers, xii., 10. } Miraculously
Gehazi--2 Kings, v., 27. } afflicted.
Uzziah--2 Chronicles, xxvi., 19. }
Naaman--2 Kings, v., 1.
Four Lepers--2 Kings, vii., 3.
In the New Testament we have but three cases, involving twelve
persons, viz.:--
(1) Man, recorded by St. Matthew, viii, 2; St. Mark, i., 40;
St. Luke, v., 12.
(2) Ten Lepers, St. Luke, xvii., 12.
(3) Simon, St. Matthew, xxvi., 6; St. Mark, xiv., 3.
The first account or mention of the disorder in the Bible, is to be
found in Leviticus; nearly three chapters, xiii., xiv., xv., being
devoted to the examination and cleansing of the afflicted, with the
minutest detail.
In chapter xiii., we are told that "if a man has a bright spot deeper
than the skin of the flesh, the hair on which has turned white, or the
white spot has a raw in it, and the scab be spread in the skin--then
shall the priest pronounce him _unclean_." But, if he have all the
above symptoms, and "the scabs do not spread, or, if he be covered
from head to foot--as white as snow--with the disease, then shall the
priest pronounce him _clean_." It should be observed, that whereas
the "_unclean_" Leper "shall dwell alone," no such restriction was
placed upon the "clean or White Leper," who was free to go about as he
desired, and also to mingle with his fellow-men. This is clear from
the accounts given us of Gehazi conversing with the King; of Naaman
performing his ordinary duties as captain of the host of the King of
Syria; we are told he was "a great man with his master, and
honourable, because by him the Lord had given victory unto Syria; he
was also a mighty man of valour," and also, from the instance of our
Blessed Lord being entertained in the house of Simon the "Leper." On
no other ground than this assumption, can these instances be
reconciled with the Levitical Law.
In the Levitical, and in every other account of the disease, it is
significant that there is no mention, or hint, of any loss of
sensation in connection with the disorder, of any affection of the
nerves, nor of any deformity of the body; no provision is made for
those who were unable to take care of themselves, nor is there a
tittle of evidence, or the barest hint given, that the disease was
either contagious or dangerous. Only two persons in the whole of the
Bible
|