FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
uahua to any other place--even to the city of Mexico itself-- invariably becomes larger, or degenerates, as the Mexicans have it! There is also in Mexico a hairless dog. It is, no doubt, the same as that known by the name of Turkish dog; since this variety came originally from Spanish America. In South America, there are several species of native dogs, found among the savages of the Orinoco and Amazon. They are small animals, usually of a whitish colour: but their owners follow the curious practice of dyeing them with annatto, indigo, and other brilliant dyes, for the purpose of rendering them more ornamental! We can only find space to say that there are many other varieties of domesticated dogs, almost unknown beyond the countries in which they are found. Such are the _Quao_ of Rhamgur, the Sumatran dog, the _Poull_ of New Ireland, the dogs of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego--those of the South Sea Islands; and the _Waht_ that inhabits some of the ranges of the Himalayas. It is reasonable to suppose that there is not a nation upon earth, hardly a tribe--civilised or savage--that does not possess some variety of the canine race differing from all the others. CHAPTER SEVEN. WILD DOGS. By _Wild Dogs_, we mean not only several sorts of true dogs, that in different parts of the world are found living in a wild state; but also Wolves, Foxes, Jackals, Hyenas, and Fennecs--for all these are but dogs in a state of nature. First, we shall speak of the true dogs living in a wild state--that is, apart from the society of man. It is not necessary here to go into the often-debated question, as to whether dogs were originally wolves, or what species of wolf the dog is descended from. This is all mere speculation, and answers no purpose. It is just as likely that wolves sprang from dogs, as that dogs came from wolves; and every one may perceive that two breeds of the dog species are often far more unlike each other--both in appearance and habits--than a dog is to a wolf itself. Again, foxes differ only from wolves in point of size; and a small wolf is in reality a fox, while a large fox may be equally regarded as a wolf. Furthermore, the jackal is nothing else than another form of the same animal--the wolf or dog, whichever you choose to term it; and the hyenas but a still _uglier_ shape of the same carnivorous creature. With regard to the true wild dogs--which are not regarded as wolves--we find them exi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
wolves
 

species

 

purpose

 

regarded

 

Mexico

 

living

 
originally
 

variety

 

America

 

debated


question

 

descended

 

nature

 

Wolves

 
Hyenas
 

Jackals

 

Fennecs

 

society

 

habits

 

animal


whichever
 

equally

 

Furthermore

 
jackal
 
choose
 

creature

 

regard

 

carnivorous

 

hyenas

 

uglier


perceive

 

breeds

 

answers

 

sprang

 

unlike

 

differ

 

reality

 
appearance
 

speculation

 

inhabits


whitish

 

colour

 
animals
 
savages
 

Orinoco

 

Amazon

 
owners
 

follow

 
brilliant
 

rendering